Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQWW\s+results\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQWW\s+results\s*$/: 70 ]

Total 70 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW results (score: 1): Author: "Peter Chamalian" <w1rm@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 05:59:25 -0400; What does age have to do with one's contest effort? I'll grant you it's harder to do at 60 than 20, but we still do it! I'll be 63 come Saturday and have no plans to stop contesting any time soon. Fo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00219.html (9,467 bytes)
42. [CQ-Contest] CQWW results (score: 1): Author: glenn@gi0kvq.co.uk (Glenn Millar); Date: Sun Jan 6 11:38:53 2002; I know this question has been asked before on the reflector, regarding the posting of CQWW results. I know that there is a CD with the results up to 97, and there is a hope that it will be updated at; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00058.html (6,660 bytes)
43. [CQ-Contest] CQWW results (score: 1): Author: SP5UAF <tomek@sp5zcc.waw.pl>; Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:58:20 +0000; Hi All, There is a long, interesting discussion about LOTW. I would like to write about another subject. CQ WW DX Contest results were published last weeks, PHONE and CW parts. Perhaps there is a kin; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00559.html (10,763 bytes)
44. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW results (score: 1): Author: Alan Zack <k7acz@cox.net>; Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:09:08 -0700; Hello Tom, A few days ago I asked the question why is it that the ARRL contest results are all listed on the ARRL web site in nice detail for many years and the ARRL sends out certificates in a timel; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00560.html (13,350 bytes)
45. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW results (score: 1): Author: "Clive Whelan" <clive.whelan@btinternet.com>; Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:55:27 -0000; I pay for QST via my ARRL sub., but it doesn't publish its own contest ( or even IARU) results in any detail; which other national society fails to do that? I pay for CQ magazine and it does. Sure, i; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00568.html (8,545 bytes)
46. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW results (score: 1): Author: Andrei Nevis <v49a@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:41:53 -0700 (PDT); Hi Tom, I have read your previous posting about CQ WW Results and would like to discuss some issues with you. Please explain me something, I did not get it. I am a subscriber of CQ Magazine and recen; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00571.html (8,785 bytes)
47. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW results (score: 1): Author: Art Searle <w2nra@optonline.net>; Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:38:11 +0000; Hi Clive, I'm confused by your statement. I went to the ARRL website and the full results of each contest, including IARU, is there with reference to QST publication. I don't have back issues to chec; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00572.html (9,197 bytes)
48. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW results (score: 1): Author: "Yuri Onipko" <va3uz@sympatico.ca>; Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:55:45 -0400; Yes, and they don't charge for the results - neither directly nor indirectly. 73 VE3DZ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00574.html (8,266 bytes)
49. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW results (score: 1): Author: SP5UAF <tomek@sp5zcc.waw.pl>; Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:43:09 +0000; Hello, Some days ago I sent a letter about the CQWW results. I got soem answers. First of all I got an e-mail from Bob K3EST. Now we know that in the case of SN3A there was a problem on our side. Bog; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00575.html (9,818 bytes)
50. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW results (score: 1): Author: "Zoli Pitman HA1AG" <ha1ag@myway.com>; Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 13:27:47 -0400 (EDT); They should change their volunteers then... What a lame excuse... I don't think DL6RAI, RW1AC & team etc are earning their living with what they get for organizing their contests and they are still; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00576.html (9,008 bytes)
51. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW results (score: 1): Author: "Lee Hiers" <aa4ga@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 23:54:50 -0400; Not that CQ needs me to defend them, but are *you* volunteering? I doubt there is a queue of people waiting at the CQ doorstep to jump in and volunteer to do this work. I've done a small bit of volun; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00582.html (8,518 bytes)
52. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW results (score: 1): Author: "Dale Martin" <kg5u@hal-pc.org>; Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 11:39:16 -0500; Hi, Lee Given that a lot of volunteer jobs are thankless and not as rewarding as others, maybe if someone (Lee, any other log checkers, etc.) would be so kind as to describe the functions and proced; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00585.html (8,804 bytes)
53. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW results (score: 1): Author: "Lee Hiers" <aa4ga@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 20:50:08 -0400; I am not familiar with current log-checking procedures in any great detail...a lot has changed since I did any of it at all, and my experience was very limited - a little assistance for K4JRB for the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00588.html (8,725 bytes)
54. [CQ-Contest] CQWW results (score: 1): Author: SP5UAF <tomek@sp5zcc.waw.pl>; Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:58:20 +0000; Hi All, There is a long, interesting discussion about LOTW. I would like to write about another subject. CQ WW DX Contest results were published last weeks, PHONE and CW parts. Perhaps there is a kin; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg01148.html (10,763 bytes)
55. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW results (score: 1): Author: Alan Zack <k7acz@cox.net>; Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:09:08 -0700; Hello Tom, A few days ago I asked the question why is it that the ARRL contest results are all listed on the ARRL web site in nice detail for many years and the ARRL sends out certificates in a timel; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg01149.html (13,350 bytes)
56. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW results (score: 1): Author: "Clive Whelan" <clive.whelan@btinternet.com>; Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:55:27 -0000; I pay for QST via my ARRL sub., but it doesn't publish its own contest ( or even IARU) results in any detail; which other national society fails to do that? I pay for CQ magazine and it does. Sure, i; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg01157.html (8,545 bytes)
57. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW results (score: 1): Author: Andrei Nevis <v49a@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:41:53 -0700 (PDT); Hi Tom, I have read your previous posting about CQ WW Results and would like to discuss some issues with you. Please explain me something, I did not get it. I am a subscriber of CQ Magazine and recen; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg01160.html (8,785 bytes)
58. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW results (score: 1): Author: Art Searle <w2nra@optonline.net>; Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:38:11 +0000; Hi Clive, I'm confused by your statement. I went to the ARRL website and the full results of each contest, including IARU, is there with reference to QST publication. I don't have back issues to chec; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg01161.html (9,197 bytes)
59. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW results (score: 1): Author: "Yuri Onipko" <va3uz@sympatico.ca>; Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:55:45 -0400; Yes, and they don't charge for the results - neither directly nor indirectly. 73 VE3DZ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg01163.html (8,266 bytes)
60. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW results (score: 1): Author: SP5UAF <tomek@sp5zcc.waw.pl>; Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:43:09 +0000; Hello, Some days ago I sent a letter about the CQWW results. I got soem answers. First of all I got an e-mail from Bob K3EST. Now we know that in the case of SN3A there was a problem on our side. Bog; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg01164.html (9,818 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]