Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CR3L\s+Should\s+Reconsider\s+Submission\s+Catagory\s+\-\s+Not\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CR3L\s+Should\s+Reconsider\s+Submission\s+Catagory\s+\-\s+Not\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] CR3L Should Reconsider Submission Catagory - Not (score: 1): Author: "Dennis McAlpine" <dbmcalpine@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 23:55:17 -0500; With all due respect, John, I believe CR3L should do whatever it wants to do within the rules as far as which category it enters. No one argues that CR3L did something outside the rules. After all, t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00181.html (12,994 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CR3L Should Reconsider Submission Catagory - Not (score: 1): Author: Shevtsov <valery.shevtsov@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 23:51:50 +0400; But what about that small group that just wanted to share op time to maximize their score without exhausting themselves. They are so far out of the running for top honors it is laughable. So, how abo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00243.html (10,067 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]