Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CT\s+vs\.\s+N1MM\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CT\s+vs\.\s+N1MM\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] CT vs. N1MM (score: 1): Author: "Warren Rothberg" <w4wr@bellsouth.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 12:31:22 -0400; I have used CT for contesting since I bought my first copy in Dayton in 1987. I have not kept up with developments in the N1MM contest software at all. So now, 19 years later, I am wondering what the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00299.html (7,155 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT vs. N1MM (score: 1): Author: "Rex Maner" <k7qq@netzero.net>; Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 00:53:22 -0000; Hi Long time User CT Well I'm in the same boat with NA, The main reason for change is that CT and NA need DOS to operate correctly . The N1MM software has the advantage that it does work in the XP en; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00308.html (9,226 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT vs. N1MM (score: 1): Author: "Craig Cook" <craig.n7or@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 20:19:35 -0700; I am always changing things up here, trying to keep contesting interesting. One thing that is cool that you can do with N1MM is go minimalist. You can make it almost as simple as CT or TR by just kee; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00316.html (10,818 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] CT vs. N1MM (score: 1): Author: Peter Dougherty <w2irt@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 23:40:10 -0400; N1MM is probably the best piece of contesting software you'll ever use. Not only is it immensely powerful, but support is first-rate, it's completely free to use, it can network for multi-multi in a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00320.html (7,942 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT vs. N1MM (score: 1): Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>; Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 05:07:16 -0000; I'm a CT person and have seen a few mis-representations here which need to be corrected. First I run, and have for years, CT on an XP SP2 machine with no problems and no work arounds. I have my FT100; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00323.html (10,893 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT vs. N1MM (score: 1): Author: n4gi@tampabay.rr.com; Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:06:45 -0400; Actually there are lots of great ops on their development/support team.... 73, Blake N4GI _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://list; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00338.html (7,733 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT vs. N1MM (score: 1): Author: "Chet, N8RA" <chetsubaccount@snet.net>; Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:00:27 -0400; N1MM by computer geeks, not contesters? Think so? Check out K1TTT at http://www.k1ttt.net/ and N1MM himself is no contest slouch either. N8RA _______________________________________________ CQ-Contes; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00340.html (8,394 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT vs. N1MM (score: 1): Author: Mark Bailey <kd4d@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:27:08 -0400; Hi Rex and Warren: It is possible to run DOS alongside WindowsXP on these new computers. The computer needs parallel and serial ports which can be a problem for some new laptops. The process is descr; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00341.html (9,586 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT vs. N1MM (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:38:11 -0400; I'm biased - I work on the N1MM project - but I think there is no comparison. N1MM really took off from where TR Log stopped, which was really a quantum step forward over CT, particularly on CW. A cr; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00342.html (9,914 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT vs. N1MM (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:29:41 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- I agree with nearly everything Peter says, but he doesn't mention one thing I have noticed over the years: N1MM is prone to bugs. Many times I have seen a new re; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00348.html (8,884 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT vs. N1MM (score: 1): Author: "Peter Chamalian" <w1rm@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 13:31:30 -0400; I'd be very careful about your comment about N1MM being for and by Computer Geeks, OM. There is a very large and active group of serious contesters who regularly contribute to and make suggestions on; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00349.html (12,321 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT vs. N1MM (score: 1): Author: "Mike Brown" <k9mi@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 18:33:05 -0000; CT out of business? I'm not a CT user, but there is a CT Win that I believe works in XP. I thought I saw something about not supporting voice keyer, but it did mention support now for NAQP and Sprint; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00352.html (13,373 bytes)
13. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT vs. N1MM (score: 1): Author: F6BEE <f6bee@free.fr>; Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 20:43:54 +0200; I have used CT for contesting since I bought my first copy in Dayton in 1987. I have not kept up with developments in the N1MM contest software at all. So now, 19 years later, I am wondering what the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00353.html (8,101 bytes)
14. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT vs. N1MM (score: 1): Author: "Clive Whelan" <clive.whelan@btinternet.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 23:26:14 -0000; Pete is right, he is biased I am not ;-). TRlog was a huge leap forward in contest logging, and it was only when XP came along and TR patently would never port to Windows that I migrated. Initially t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00356.html (11,144 bytes)
15. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT vs. N1MM (score: 1): Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>; Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 23:29:07 -0000; Bill in the early early days of CT long before the internet we would get bug patches and fixes a day or so before the a contest. I lived in San Diego section then and Rick, N6ND, was the unofficial g; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00357.html (10,394 bytes)
16. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT vs. N1MM (score: 1): Author: Peter Dougherty <w2irt@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 19:54:04 -0400; <snip> Yes, I agree. That's my frustration with N1MM at times as well. What I'd love to see Tom do is work for a known-stable, bug-free, tested-up-the-wazoo version, and once achieved, also make it a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00358.html (9,165 bytes)
17. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT vs. N1MM (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 18:14:13 -0700; Hi Bill But, you don't have to download the new releases when they come out. You can just wait till they get the bugs out. There is usually 2 or 3 releases a week and you don't have to wait long to; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00361.html (8,363 bytes)
18. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT vs. N1MM (score: 1): Author: "Paul O'Kane" <verix@ei5di.com>; Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 01:46:13 +0000; I'm biased - I work on the N1MM project I'm biased too - SD does this, and more. It runs on any Windows PC and is free from www.ei5di.com/sd/sdsetup.exe It is intended for SO unassisted entries. Here; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00362.html (8,820 bytes)
19. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT vs. N1MM (score: 1): Author: "Rex Maner" <k7qq@netzero.net>; Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 02:13:22 -0000; I'm also biased toward NA in that if I accidently hit the wrong key eg \ in NA nothing happens, in N1MM all kinds of goofey stuff happens and I end up off the freq I was running on and have even had; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00365.html (11,929 bytes)
20. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT vs. N1MM (score: 1): Author: "Robert Naumann" <w5ov@w5ov.com>; Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 07:02:03 -0500; I find myself in an awkward position of agreeing in principle with Mal. Sometimes, the programmers are pulled away from the fundamentals by demands of some of the more inventive and creative users. O; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00368.html (10,920 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]