To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CT vs. N1MM |
From: | F6BEE <f6bee@free.fr> |
Date: | Thu, 19 Oct 2006 20:43:54 +0200 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
I have used CT for contesting since I bought my first copy in Dayton in 1987. I have not kept up with developments in the N1MM contest software at all. So now, 19 years later, I am wondering what the pro’s/con’s of each package are. Has anyone published a comparison? Is it time to change? Time to try Win Test : it looks like CT and does everything the other software are dreaming to do ! Great for SO2R. Also written by contesters (the FY5KE M/S team) for contesters and used by 25 % of teams at WRTC 2006 as well as some contests masters (not only from Portugal !). See http://www.win-test.com/ and download the trial version. 73 de Jacques, F6BEE _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CT vs. N1MM, Mike Brown |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SSB Sections in SS, Clint Talmadge |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CT vs. N1MM, Rex Maner |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CT vs. N1MM, Chet, N8RA |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |