Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CW\s+Exchange\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CW\s+Exchange\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] CW Exchange (score: 1): Author: "n4dxi@arrl.net" <n4dxi@aol.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:39:00 -0500 (EST); During the CQ WW DX there was a lot of QRN and QRM....exchange was something like... Me....S & P up the band, hearing a DX in an exchange, checking he's not a dupe, waiting, then.... DX: "...TU" at 3; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00470.html (7,926 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CW Exchange (score: 1): Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 17:18:22 -0500; John, I think about this a bit too. I mainly do what you did if it's a pileup and he's banging out calls at what seems like 20 a minute. I'll often send just my call again for him to confirm. I also; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00476.html (9,596 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] CW Exchange (score: 1): Author: "Robert Brandon" <rb@austin.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 17:32:15 -0600; As a DXer, if you really want to be sure he got your call right, you should not give an exchange until you can copy his sending of your call. You might send "N4DXI?" and get him to send it again. I d; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00479.html (10,139 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] CW Exchange (score: 1): Author: "Andy V. Melanyin" <ua3dpx@mail.ru>; Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:04:54 +0400; give him Your call again and make him cfm it!! 73! Andy UA3DPX/RM3F -- Original Message -- From: "n4dxi@arrl.net" <n4dxi@aol.com> To: <cq-contest@contesting.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 12:3; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00494.html (9,660 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] CW Exchange (score: 1): Author: Henk Remijn PA5KT <pa5kt@remijn.net>; Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 08:27:11 +0100; I will never give a report to the dx if I am not sure he copied my callsign correct. So send your call again until you hear the dx coming back with your call. What does not work is what you did in be; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00496.html (9,868 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] CW Exchange (score: 1): Author: "Albert Crespo" <f5vhj@orange.fr>; Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 05:50:32 -0800; I want to make sure I am in the log correctly and only if I am in doubt, I send my call. With the penalty rate of losing three QSOs for a busted call, if the other station does not have your call cor; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00497.html (11,472 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] CW Exchange (score: 1): Author: "Gerry Treas, K8GT" <k8gt@mi.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 11:44:18 -0500; If there is a question in my mind whether he got my call correct, I will, when going back to him, send my call twice, that gets his attention. Then I usually get a confirmation at the end. If you onl; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00508.html (10,570 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] CW Exchange (score: 1): Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 12:52:29 -0500; This year's contest was unusual for me. I run 100W into an 18 ft vertical. I also have an awful callsign for CW: VE3HLS, which gets mangled into SLS, HLI, HRS and other variations. I spend a LOT of t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00519.html (11,720 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]