Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Coax\s+Stubs\s+for\s+SO2R\s*$/: 111 ]

Total 111 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Coax Stubs for SO2R (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 22:07:09 -0300
This is about coax stubs. Sent this earlier to "Towertalk" then I thought perhaps it was better suited to contesting. Reposting, with some edits: I've seen the K2TR stubs, K1TTT page and have recentl
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00058.html (7,966 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Coax Stubs for SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Jukka Klemola <jpklemola@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 10:44:55 +0300
Mike, Sorry .. too little data. I ran into same situation. My solution is now to remove all diodes and transistors from the system. Those I cannot remove, I RF filter with capacitors and ferrites. Bo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00063.html (10,778 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Coax Stubs for SO2R (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <k6ll.dave@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 22:13:56 -0700
Mike, I guess the problem that you are seeing is that when radio A transmits on 40, you can hear interference on 20 and 15, around the harmonic frequencies? I suspect that radio B is being overloaded
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00064.html (11,301 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Coax Stubs for SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 09:36:00 -0400
Hey Mike, Some great replies to you so far... One other comment I have: You cut the subs based on frequency and velocity factor... I was recounted a story recently about a well-known contester who ha
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00067.html (11,300 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Coax Stubs for SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 06:41:34 -0700
Mike double-posted this to another reflector, where I referred him to a piece I wrote for the latest NCJ. http://k9yc.com/LocatingStubs.pdf Advice already posted here about looking for leakage and ha
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00068.html (9,603 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Coax Stubs for SO2R (score: 1)
Author: "Leigh S. Jones, KR6X" <kr6x@kr6x.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 10:46:24 -0700
Having extensive experience operating from multioperator stations on the West Coast has given me some insight into interference issues. I can confirm that quite often the source of trouble is not in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00073.html (13,047 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Coax Stubs for SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 17:03:10 -0500
what did you use to make the cable length correct? Joe WB9SBD Sig The Original Rolling Ball Clock Idle Tyme Idle-Tyme.com http://www.idle-tyme.com On 9/8/2015 4:14 PM, Mike Smith VE9AA wrote: Thanks
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00088.html (11,358 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Coax Stubs for SO2R (score: 1)
Author: "Juan EA5RS" <ea5rs@ono.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 00:15:01 +0200
front end nor finals of the rigs. It can indeed be elsewhere. I second Leigh's statement. Receiver overload and harmonics interference are the easy ones to cure with bandpass filters and/or stubs. I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00089.html (15,174 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Coax Stubs for SO2R (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Hider" <n3rr@erols.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 18:53:49 -0400
MIKE!! Just to verify, you are putting a 1/4 wavelength 20m Shorted stub and a 1/4 wavelength 10m Shorted stub in parallel with the coax line at your transmitter while you are transmitting on 40 m, c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00090.html (12,111 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Coax Stubs for SO2R (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Hider" <n3rr@erols.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 19:51:54 -0400
OK, Mike, Moving forward: Yes, your 40m 1/4 WL shorted stub on your 40m transmitter should attenuate the 20m transmitted signal. UNLESS, you are not receiving the harmonic from the antenna you are tr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00091.html (14,876 bytes)

11. [CQ-Contest] Coax Stubs for SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 23:23:45 -0400
Wondering how those of you using a Six Pack antenna switch hookup your stubs? I have two coax cables from the Six Pack coming into the shack going to each radio. Each station has a multi band Dunesta
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00098.html (8,232 bytes)

12. [CQ-Contest] Coax Stubs for SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Randall K Martin <rkmassoc@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 08:51:25 -0600
Jeff, regarding stubs on six-pack, I place mine on the six individual band ports. A few are "Tee-d" in right at the SO239 on the six pack, but most are connected with a "T" a short distance away. I n
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00100.html (9,105 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Coax Stubs for SO2R (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 11:20:15 -0500
On 80m my Dunestar 600 filters have high SWR higher in the band. I never go above 3.85 MHz so it is not an issue for me. My 20m and 40m beams are close together and in one case they share the same bo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00101.html (9,444 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Coax Stubs for SO2R (score: 1)
Author: "Roberts, Will" <Will.Roberts@duke-energy.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 17:08:02 +0000
Hey Jeff, I use only tuned stubs for SO2R with my Six Pak. I don't have any other filtering. I connect the stubs on the antenna side coax connectors on the Six Pak with one or more T connectors. Ther
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00102.html (10,459 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Coax Stubs for SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 11:06:57 -0700
On Tue,9/8/2015 8:23 PM, Jeff Clarke wrote: Wondering how those of you using a Six Pack antenna switch hookup your stubs? I have two coax cables from the Six Pack coming into the shack going to each
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00103.html (12,778 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Coax Stubs for SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 13:30:17 -0500
Ok distance from the amp, as described below, can make a difference. on the level of blocking harmonics. Now how about on recieve side if you want say youre on 20 and want to block 40, does this dist
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00108.html (10,272 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Coax Stubs for SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 12:22:21 -0700
On Tue,9/8/2015 9:24 PM, donovanf@starpower.net wrote: That "growly" signals you're hearing are harmonics of your transmitted signal generated by unintentional radiators, especially switching power s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00110.html (10,610 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Coax Stubs for SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 16:51:39 -0400
Will and others who suggested putting the stub at the antenna side connectors of your Six Packs.... Are your switch boxes at the top or bottom of your tower or inside the shack? The stubs are actuall
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00111.html (11,012 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] Coax Stubs for SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 21:51:58 -0700
Covered in the app note. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00117.html (9,047 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] Coax Stubs for SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Jukka Klemola <jpklemola@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 08:34:05 +0300
Seems like people who have never done any of this are ahring their views. That is good. People want to share and be in the group. In case you have a problem like should 40m quarter wave resonator's o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00119.html (22,844 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu