Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Contest\s+Exchange\s*$/: 34 ]

Total 34 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Contest Exchange (score: 1)
Author: margoh@compuserve.com (Hill, Russell C.)
Date: Sat Jan 24 18:38:38 1998
Greetings, All: In the CQ 160M contest this weekend there is a Carribean station which is giving 599 BK as his exchange. The required exchange is supposed to be signal report, state/province/dxcc cou
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-01/msg00518.html (7,195 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] Contest Exchange (score: 1)
Author: dietz@texas.net (Chuck)
Date: Sun Jan 25 03:41:10 1998
In CT, if you put in "BK" for his report it will still score him properly. (Delimma solved!) Many casual contesters may not know the proper exchange, but I'm sure we can count them if we get all the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-01/msg00520.html (7,951 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] Contest exchange (score: 1)
Author: w7xu@dtgnet.com (W7XU Arliss)
Date: Tue Mar 10 17:47:19 1998
Speaking as someone whose contesting is primarily of the VHF/UHF variety, most of the exchanges that have been described here would not count as QSO's on VHF. In particular, with meteor scatter both
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-03/msg00153.html (6,762 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] Contest Exchange (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 09:36:16 -0600
This was lightly touched on a while ago. But today it got me to thinking. What is the best exchange out there? I mean really, what now days do you expect to hear so you can maximize your ability to c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00006.html (7,435 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Exchange (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 17:07:06 -0500
I'm a sucker for a good hypothetical, Joe. Here's how I think it should go: CQ TEST N4ZR TEST P5AL P5AL 5NN WV TU 5NN 100 TU N4ZR 73, Pete N4ZR The World Contest Station Database, updated daily at ww
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00007.html (8,541 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Exchange (score: 1)
Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 10:07:52 +0500
Hi Pete and all, Being on the S&P side I would rather hear N4ZR N4ZR test instead of CQ TEST N4ZR TEST For me to know your call sign is more important then the word TEST given twice :) And please ple
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00008.html (10,033 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Exchange (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Lindquist, WW3DE" <ww3de@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 00:35:09 -0500
Well, as long as everyone is chiming in: The very last thing I want to hear in a transmission from a station soliciting contacts in any way, shape or form is that station's call sign. Broke my own ru
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00009.html (11,557 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Exchange (score: 1)
Author: "Barry Merrill" <barry@mxg.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 09:07:21 -0600
I think the final line should be TU N4ZR <<TEST>> with the final TEST bumped up in speed, perhaps. If I just hear N4ZR at the end, I think you are S&P and calling someone else, or I have to wait for
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00010.html (7,924 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Exchange (score: 1)
Author: Mark Bailey <kd4d@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 09:08:00 -0500
Hi Pete; The most important thing in the CQ is your call. I think you should send it twice. I don't think you should send test twice and CQ TEST is redundant! :-) I also don't think the S&P station n
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00011.html (9,940 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Exchange (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Lindquist, WW3DE" <ww3de@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 11:41:02 -0500
I was inadvertently ambiguous in my late night/early morning posting. My apologies. Here's an example of what I meant: 1. TEST (or CQ) TEST WW3DE WW3DE [Avoid the inclination to add "TEST" here, sinc
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00013.html (13,133 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Exchange (score: 1)
Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 00:03:43 +0500
Suppose I came up on your frequency after you had already sent the word TEST. What I hear is just your call sign. How do I know whether you are calling CQ or just calling someone. I think TEST after
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00015.html (16,039 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Exchange (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 14:20:07 EST
Maybe the S&P stations doesn't technically need to send TU, but can't we take a second for some politeness? Also, when I hear a TU, it adds an element of confirmation that the guy is acknowledging my
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00016.html (8,954 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Exchange (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Lindquist, WW3DE" <ww3de@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 14:34:59 -0500
My *preference* when concluding one contact and moving on to the next (especially in the unlikely situation [for me] that I have multiple callers) would be to send "TU QRZ." That way, if you just "ha
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00018.html (17,391 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Exchange (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <jeff@ac0c.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 18:54:50 -0600
The problem with TU QRZ for a RUN station is that it burns time for late arriving S&P. If I'm operating unassisted, and I don't have a prior contact from the log spot on your frequency, then I don't
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00021.html (19,108 bytes)

15. [CQ-Contest] Contest Exchange (score: 1)
Author: KAZeringue <kazeringue@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 20:29:57 -0500
OK, here's another hypothetical.... Supposing I want to optimize my transmission for maximum CW skimmer spot potential as well as Qso's, is there a "best" call to make? CQ TEST W4KAZ W4KAZ -or TEST
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00022.html (6,839 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Exchange (score: 1)
Author: w7dra@juno.com
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 18:43:39 -0800
i send TEST because it feels good. i send DE because it feels good i also send TEST in honor of KH6IJ get out your hand key and send some of the messages discussed here and see if you don't agree, so
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00023.html (8,196 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Exchange (score: 1)
Author: "Weidner- ARLHS / K2JXW / USCGA" <weidner@waterw.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 22:56:02 -0500
Hmmmmm . . . In my 50+ years on CW, I've come to see that "TU" at the end of a transmission has come to replace the old, traditional "AR" -- both meaning "over to you" at the end of a transmission. J
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00025.html (10,568 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Exchange (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 08:24:30 EST
Jim, In my 45+ years of contesting, I don't think I've ever received a contest exchange of " 5NN CA AR". (Double aargh - is he in California or Arkansas? :> ) So no need to send a TU at the end to sa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00027.html (10,137 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Exchange (score: 1)
Author: Jim Smith <jimsmith@shaw.ca>
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 02:27:44 -0800
FWIW here's what I do. I program the TU QRZ macro to send TU VE7FO TEST. If I have to send CQ several times between answers then I let the macro finish. If I'm getting one or two calls after completi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00028.html (10,262 bytes)

20. [CQ-Contest] Contest Exchange (score: 1)
Author: "James Cain" <jamesdavidcain@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 10:44:04 -0600
F1: TEST K1TN F2: 5NN WI F3: TU K1TN F4: K1TN _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00032.html (7,864 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu