Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Contest\s+QTH\,\s+hilltop\s+or\s+seaside\?\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Contest QTH, hilltop or seaside? (score: 1)
Author: "Mike & Coreen Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2015 09:53:40 -0400
If you had to choose between a 600' hilltop or an oceanfront QTH in VE9, VE1 which would it be?--6m thru 160m. Sure, 600' doesn't sound like a lot, but most of the land around these parts is from 30'
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-01/msg00000.html (7,965 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest QTH, hilltop or seaside? (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2015 08:08:14 -0700
Given the constraint of simple antennas, no big towers, I'd go with the hilltop (and carefully model with HFTA - too high an effective height is bad, too). Barry W2UP Sure, 600' doesn't sound like a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-01/msg00001.html (9,090 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest QTH, hilltop or seaside? (score: 1)
Author: Rudy Bakalov via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2015 17:25:30 +0000 (UTC)
You may want to run some analysis to make an educated tradeoff, based on specific location and antennas in mind. My rural VE3 QTH is 1200' ASL and antennas do perform differently than expected- the 9
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-01/msg00003.html (10,378 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest QTH, hilltop or seaside? (score: 1)
Author: "K5WA" <K5WA@Comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2015 12:02:02 -0600
Mike, You've already achieved 20 db over most of us to the south of you by being in VE9 land but if you want a better location and are unable to erect even a 40' tower for a beam, I vote for the 600'
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-01/msg00004.html (10,023 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest QTH, hilltop or seaside? (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2015 19:58:53 +0100
The first test should be for horizon obstructions. Using Radio Mobile by VE2DBE and 1 arc-second SRTM maps determine the visual horizon as seen from the antenna position. An excellent QTH will have h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-01/msg00006.html (8,896 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest QTH, hilltop or seaside? (score: 1)
Author: VK4TS Trent Sampson <vk4ts@outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2015 05:17:48 +1000
Hi Mike, Given those constraints - go the hilltop - a forty foot tower with a tribander will play quite hard - in fact if the drop off is favourable even a 40M yagi can work at that height -again ref
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-01/msg00007.html (9,960 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest QTH, hilltop or seaside? (score: 1)
Author: donovanf@starpower.net
Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2015 17:25:49 -0500 (EST)
Hi Mike, Ocean front locations are very difficult to deal with, especially at higher latitudes where the difference between high and low tides can be extreme. Much better are large salt marsh sites s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-01/msg00008.html (11,848 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest QTH, hilltop or seaside? (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2015 20:25:50 -0500
Go with the hilltop. The oceanfront is great if you have unobstructed low angle in a few favored directions. But oceanfront with low angles cut off is not a good compromise. Spend A LOT of time with
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-01/msg00009.html (8,198 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest QTH, hilltop or seaside? (score: 1)
Author: "ScottW3TX@verizon.net" <scottw3tx@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2015 22:46:13 -0500
Is there an argument to be made for favoring plain vanilla flat land in all directions, instead of a hill or mountaintop, so that the TOA's can be optimized for all bands by antenna height/stacking f
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-01/msg00012.html (8,988 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest QTH, hilltop or seaside? (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2015 23:40:01 -0600
Maybe....if money is no object. A winning setup could be had with the right location and two or three 60 foot towers. That won't happen on flat land. Stan, K5GO Sent from my iPad ____________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-01/msg00013.html (10,716 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest QTH, hilltop or seaside? (score: 1)
Author: "Eric M. Guzman" <np3a@np3a.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2015 08:38:44 -0400
If you really want a record breaking QTH, then buy some land at KP5 and put up some aluminum there. Guaranteed you will break aome records. Now serious... My dream QTH is a combination of both. A 500
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-01/msg00014.html (9,276 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest QTH, hilltop or seaside? (score: 1)
Author: K8MR via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2015 08:57:35 -0500
Do consider the issues of keeping a waterfront antenna system working given all the salt water corrosion issues. Check out the stories of what maintenance PJ2T has to go through. 73 - Jim K8MR Is the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-01/msg00015.html (10,296 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest QTH, hilltop or seaside? (score: 1)
Author: Yuri Blanarovich <k3bu@optimum.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2015 10:47:39 -0500 (EST)
Hilltop vs. flat land enhances and lowers the TOA, which roughly tribander at 60 - 80 ft is close in performance to 2 or 3 stack at 200 ft. Plus the hill - elevation brings one closer to the propagat
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-01/msg00017.html (13,629 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest QTH, hilltop or seaside? (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2015 11:15:19 -0500
Hey Mike & HNY, Having played at many VE1 & VE9 stations, and operating portable from many others, I'd say that if you don't have an unlimited budget, go for either the hill, or, my personal preferen
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-01/msg00018.html (12,422 bytes)

15. [CQ-Contest] Contest QTH, hilltop or seaside? (score: 1)
Author: "James Cain" <jamesdavidcain@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2015 14:09:26 -0500
The discussion of takeoff angles, Fresnel zones, "earth," and so on, was pretty well settled in 1903 by Dr John Ambrose Fleming FRS, in his "Hertzian Wave Wireless Telegraphy." Once you connect Flemi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-01/msg00019.html (8,671 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest QTH, hilltop or seaside? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2015 13:46:56 -0800
If you have the real estate and the dollars to support those stacks, sure. BUT -- having operated stations at the top of high ridges, they are the clear winner for moderate budgets. I ran QRP on FD f
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-01/msg00020.html (11,527 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest QTH, hilltop or seaside? (score: 1)
Author: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2015 10:47:48 -0600 (CST)
True enough. I suspect you could get a real 'bang" out of that place! 73, ron w3wn If you really want a record breaking QTH, then buy some land at KP5 and put up some aluminum there. Guaranteed you w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-01/msg00021.html (9,037 bytes)

18. [CQ-Contest] Contest QTH, hilltop or seaside? (score: 1)
Author: ko7ss--- via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2015 08:31:06 -0800
Last year I had a similiar choice when moving my station. A mountaintop or flat desert as far as the eye could see. The desert isn't salt water but enough radials can be put under an elevated vertica
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-01/msg00023.html (9,186 bytes)

19. [CQ-Contest] Contest QTH, hilltop or seaside? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Breakall <jimb@psu.edu>
Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2015 00:46:35 -0500
Hello All, This is an interesting topic for sure and I have experienced both hills and ocean with the volcano 300 foot high hilltop at my contest station built near Arecibo, Puerto Rico where we have
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-01/msg00024.html (14,691 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest QTH, hilltop or seaside? (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2015 13:03:33 -0700
Since I was mentioned in a previous posting, I'll say a few words about my QTH and HFTA. I live on a hilltop with 400 feet of dropoff within 1/4 mile from NW, through N, E, SE and S. However, towards
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-01/msg00025.html (12,994 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu