CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest QTH, hilltop or seaside?

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest QTH, hilltop or seaside?
From: K8MR via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Reply-to: jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2015 08:57:35 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Do consider the issues of keeping a waterfront antenna system working given all the salt water corrosion issues. Check out the stories of what maintenance PJ2T has to go through.

73  -  Jim  K8MR

-----Original Message-----
From: ScottW3TX@verizon.net <scottw3tx@verizon.net>
To: sawyered <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Cc: <cq-contest@contesting.com> <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Thu, Jan 1, 2015 11:18 pm
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest QTH, hilltop or seaside?

Is there an argument to be made for favoring plain vanilla flat land in all directions, instead of a hill or mountaintop, so that the TOA's can be optimized for all bands by antenna height/stacking for all important directions?

Best regards,
Scott w3tx

On Jan 1, 2015, at 8:25 PM, "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net> wrote:

Go with the hilltop. The oceanfront is great if you have unobstructed low angle in a few favored directions. But oceanfront with low angles cut off
is not a good compromise.



Spend A LOT of time with HFTA after carefully detailing the terrain within 1000ft of the antennas. My best antennas are all 25 - 30 ft to Europe off
the side of my hill to Europe.



Ed  N1UR




_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>