Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Did\s+I\s+cheat\s+in\s+NAQP\s+CW\?\s*$/: 38 ]

Total 38 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] Did I cheat in NAQP CW? (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 19:59:01 -0700
In the paper days, we tried to keep paper dupe sheets the best we could and it was expected that you would re dupe your logs prior to submitting them. I am very happy that we have crossed that hurdle
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00174.html (13,775 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] Did I cheat in NAQP CW? (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Faber" <andrewfaber@ymail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 21:06:17 -0800
Jim, You are absolutely right. There is a good lesson here. As I admitted in the NCJ writeup, I am one of them. I hadn't heard you at all until 80m, when you called me once and we couldn't make the Q
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00175.html (12,547 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] Did I cheat in NAQP CW? (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 23:23:51 -0500
Slippery slopes? So OK, let's say WX3QRM (Single Op Non Assisted) is calling "CQ Contest looking for VE8 or VY1" A fellow contester, WX3QSY, decides to call WX3QRM to tell him "Hey, VY1JA is up 15 an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00176.html (13,535 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] Did I cheat in NAQP CW? (score: 1)
Author: K4RO Kirk Pickering <k4ro.tcg@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 02:59:38 -0600
Here is my experience using regarding SCP & pre-fill databases. For years now (a decade or more) I used a Super Check Partial made up of only the call signs that I have worked from my station. I was
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00177.html (11,408 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] Did I cheat in NAQP CW? (score: 1)
Author: Doug Grant <dougk1dg@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 19:45:04 +0000
K1AR once said "All you have to do is copy the call and type it into the computer. It doesn't seem like too much to ask ops to do those two things correctly." Put that way, it's hard for me to disagr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00184.html (10,115 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] Did I cheat in NAQP CW? (score: 1)
Author: wayg@cape-vision.com
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 07:03:53 -0700
First, I'd like to thank everyone for some very informative and educational dialogue on here, I don't post frequently to the group. Here are my questions: During SS I was calling CQ SS without qualif
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00188.html (9,503 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] Did I cheat in NAQP CW? (score: 1)
Author: "Gerry Lynch" <director@allianceparty.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 19:44:32 -0800
Long words you got there! I think you meant to say, 900 words per hour, or 15 words per minute. Still not exactly a master typing challenge, but a bit different! 73 Gerry GI0RTN _____________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00192.html (8,915 bytes)

28. Re: [CQ-Contest] Did I cheat in NAQP CW? (score: 1)
Author: "KU7Y" <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 09:09:58 -0700
I think there is something missing..... During that 500 per hour rate, you spend at least half that time sending your exchange so you would have to double the typing rate during RX. OK, back in my ho
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00197.html (8,895 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] Did I cheat in NAQP CW? (score: 1)
Author: "Wayne Mills" <n7ng@bresnan.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 10:29:27 -0700
Geoffrey, "At what point are the rules incapable of addressing the current issues?" Excellent point. In general, humans don't like changes. We like stability. In our passion not to change anything si
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00200.html (8,307 bytes)

30. Re: [CQ-Contest] Did I cheat in NAQP CW? (score: 1)
Author: "Wayne Mills" <n7ng@bresnan.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 22:47:24 -0700
Yep! Not me! Me too! Yep! My solution has been to redefine my participation. It's working for me. 73, Wayne, N7NG Jackson Hole And of course, that raises another question: If writing the rules will t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00204.html (8,294 bytes)

31. Re: [CQ-Contest] Did I cheat in NAQP CW? (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <theroadtrip@mts.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 22:16:08 -0600
And of course, that raises another question: If writing the rules will take a team of lawyers, then each of us will have to consult with our $300-per-hour legal beagles to understand them. Is that th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00205.html (9,549 bytes)

32. Re: [CQ-Contest] Did I cheat in NAQP CW? (score: 1)
Author: Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us>
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 07:25:23 -0600
Looking around at the rest of USA pass times, the answer may seem to be, "Yes!" Me either, Fun is the name of the game for me and KISS figures heavily into that. Look at the major sports in the USA a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00209.html (9,659 bytes)

33. Re: [CQ-Contest] Did I cheat in NAQP CW? (score: 1)
Author: Richard Hill <rehill@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 07:15:40 -0800
If we did have perfect rules, and perfect understanding of them, the reflector would go dark and everyone would have to get back on their radios. ;-) Rich NU6T _______________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00210.html (11,004 bytes)

34. Re: [CQ-Contest] Did I cheat in NAQP CW? (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Lindquist, WW3DE" <ww3de@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 21:04:02 +0000 (UTC)
What's rare to Delaware stations in contests like SS are NT, ND, NL and DE.  We're pretty much  in the same boat as everyone else. VT and RI are not usually that rare from here.  I had an easier time
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00212.html (11,460 bytes)

35. Re: [CQ-Contest] Did I cheat in NAQP CW? (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Lindquist, WW3DE" <ww3de@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 21:23:38 +0000 (UTC)
Just when did ham radio contesting stop being about having fun? Yep! Not me! Me too! Yep! My solution has been to redefine my participation. It's working for me. 73, Wayne, N7NG Jackson Hole And of c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00213.html (9,275 bytes)

36. Re: [CQ-Contest] Did I cheat in NAQP CW? (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Lindquist, WW3DE" <ww3de@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 09:10:14 -0500
Following up on this thread, which already has generated considerable comment: Shelby makes a valid point, which others - including a major contest sponsor's representative I consulted - have support
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00288.html (13,014 bytes)

37. [CQ-Contest] Did I cheat in NAQP CW? (score: 1)
Author: <w2lc@twcny.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 13:26:11 -0500
Rick, You make me laugh! Here is another good one for you. I received the following for the ARRL 160m contest: Now I'm not poking fun at the log checker, just stating the facts. -- You are receiving
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00293.html (10,568 bytes)

38. Re: [CQ-Contest] Did I cheat in NAQP CW? (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 20:02:54 -0700
Dog gone it! The contest robot just put me in the assisted class! LOL CC Packet Cluster W0MU-1 W0MU.NET or 67.40.148.194 "A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may nev
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00294.html (11,490 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu