Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Dodgy\s+spotting\s+\'witch\-hunt\'\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Dodgy\s+spotting\s+\'witch\-hunt\'\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Dodgy spotting 'witch-hunt' (score: 1): Author: jljarvis@adelphia.net (jljarvis); Date: Fri Apr 19 14:14:05 2002; Folks, While this may be a tiresome topic for some, I, for one, would like to see some fact-based vision applied to the process of rulemaking. NS3T's data makes a giant step in that regard. As Zack/K; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00244.html (8,260 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Dodgy spotting 'witch-hunt' (score: 1): Author: geoiii@kkn.net (George Fremin III - K5TR); Date: Fri Apr 19 13:38:48 2002; Yes. In fact I will go a step further and recommend that we also modify the contest logging programs to do a self spot anytime you call CQ. (This idea was thought up by N5KO about 7 months ago.) -- G; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00247.html (8,028 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Dodgy spotting 'witch-hunt' (score: 1): Author: kr6x@kr6x.com (Leigh S. Jones, KR6X); Date: Fri Apr 19 14:45:17 2002; This is a neat idea if we are trying to push the guys still using pencils out of contesting. That would probably include newcomers to contesting, as well as N6PN.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00248.html (9,199 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] Dodgy spotting 'witch-hunt' (score: 1): Author: k2qmf@juno.com (k2qmf@juno.com); Date: Fri Apr 19 18:51:51 2002; This is a great idea!! This would stop all this foolishness and maybe make contesting a little more "FUN". After all isn't that what ham radio is all about???? 73, Ted K2QMF. See ya at Dayton for som; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00250.html (9,516 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] Dodgy spotting 'witch-hunt' (score: 1): Author: ha5pp@yahoo.com (Zoltan Szoke); Date: Fri Apr 19 22:29:05 2002; Hi, Yes. All contesters (callsign) will be on culsters. The contest program will make a callsign-map per band. We can see the call-map on monitor. We will no need any hunting (mults, etc.). The loggi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00253.html (10,713 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] Dodgy spotting 'witch-hunt' (score: 1): Author: w7why@harborside.com (Tom Osborne); Date: Sat Apr 20 23:41:34 2002; Or just forget about packet and do it without spotting at all. No? Why not. Tom W7WHY; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00263.html (8,113 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] Dodgy spotting 'witch-hunt' (score: 1): Author: k2qmf@juno.com (k2qmf@juno.com); Date: Sat Apr 20 21:38:01 2002; Because it's more "FUN" to use packet for some of us... K2QMF On Sat, 20 Apr 2002 22:41:34 +0100 Tom Osborne <w7why@harborside.com> writes: ___________________________________________________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00265.html (8,978 bytes)
8. [CQ-Contest] Dodgy spotting 'witch-hunt' (score: 1): Author: va3uz@rac.ca (VA3UZ); Date: Thu Apr 25 00:26:29 2002; Then it will be a "spot sending and reading Contest" and I'll be definitely out of it. Still vote for shutting down all the clusters during major Contests. 73 yuri (still VA3UZ); /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00363.html (8,774 bytes)
9. [CQ-Contest] Dodgy spotting 'witch-hunt' (score: 1): Author: zf2nt@candw.ky (Bruce B. Sawyer); Date: Thu Apr 25 18:57:11 2002; I still think the suggestion K5TR put out the other day (and credited to N5KO) is the best I've heard yet. Allow self-spotting, and encourage EVERYBODY to put out a spot on themselves every time the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00396.html (8,583 bytes)
10. [CQ-Contest] Dodgy spotting 'witch-hunt' (score: 1): Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW); Date: Thu Apr 25 17:45:35 2002; OK, so let me see if I've got this straight: The packet cluster system was originally constructed for use by contesters during contests. It was most heavily used during the Big Six contest weekends (; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00401.html (10,232 bytes)
11. [CQ-Contest] Dodgy spotting 'witch-hunt' (score: 1): Author: kr6x@kr6x.com (Leigh S. Jones, KR6X); Date: Thu Apr 25 17:09:42 2002; Bruce, I don't think that the intent was to bring the cluster system to its knees. Hopefully there would be adequate preparation for this to be effective; heaven knows the internet itself will be qui; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00404.html (10,682 bytes)
12. [CQ-Contest] Dodgy spotting 'witch-hunt' (score: 1): Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW); Date: Fri Apr 26 14:20:44 2002; So now the solution to stopping cluster cheats is to force everyone to use the cluster and to effectively discourage or ban those who don't from participating in the contest? In other words, to stop; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00414.html (11,206 bytes)
13. [CQ-Contest] Dodgy spotting 'witch-hunt' (score: 1): Author: kr6x@kr6x.com (Leigh S. Jones, KR6X); Date: Fri Apr 26 16:52:09 2002; Right, an unfortunate side effect preventing the use of what is effectively a great idea but for the side effect. Sure would have cut down on those busted spots... the its to put; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00416.html (12,572 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]