Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Ed\s+N1UR\s+\"competitive\s+contester\s+\"\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Ed N1UR "competitive contester " (score: 1)
Author: "rob" <wa1fcn@charter.net>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 10:04:10 -0500
Ed I had to read your post several times to be sure I understood it. I do not believe the majority of contesters believe your idea that someone CQ ing and not producing replies means you can take thi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-05/msg00411.html (7,084 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Ed N1UR "competitive contester " (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Sawyer" <SawyerEd@Earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 16:03:27 -0400
My point was not to go "prowling for CQing stations" without answers and jump on them. I don't believe anyone is doing that. Certainly not commonly from what I hear. My point was that if I start CQin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-05/msg00420.html (8,141 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Ed N1UR "competitive contester " (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 18:35:07 -0500
In Ed's defense, I will just state a couple of facts. On CW, on average, there are approximately 150-200 "slots" that are potentially available where you might call CQ and be productive. More on some
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00005.html (10,165 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Ed N1UR "competitive contester " (score: 1)
Author: Charles Harpole <hs0zcw@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 12:47:09 +0700
Yes, I am sick of "empty CQing" that is happening just to try to hold the freq. When will this begin to happen on several bands, maybe already" 73, Charly -- Charly, HS0ZCW __________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00007.html (9,111 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Ed N1UR "competitive contester " (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 15:38:09 +0200
Sometimes it takes a lot of "empty CQing" when a station runs qrp or low power with small antennas 73 Peter --Original Message-- From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00011.html (10,363 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Ed N1UR "competitive contester " (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith <dougw9wi@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2013 09:54:07 -0500
I am using a rock solid 250hz bandwidth filter. That person is "non existent to me in most cases" when I am 250hz away. I have a good narrow filter as well; if you're CQing 250Hz from where I'm CQing
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00012.html (8,365 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Ed N1UR "competitive contester " (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 22:13:55 +0200
Hi Charles, He canīt continue cqing while he is on a different band working Qs as only one signal is allowed at the same time. And concerning the break between calls, usually one stops the cq when he
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00017.html (12,154 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Ed N1UR "competitive contester " (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 18:52:44 -0700
But, how many will you be working that are calling the other station off frequency that are in your bandpass? :-) 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00021.html (8,145 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu