Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+FW\:\s+Spotting\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+FW\:\s+Spotting\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] FW: Spotting (score: 1): Author: nh7a@arrl.net (Al Crespo); Date: Sat Mar 9 06:51:49 2002; Pre-contest publicity is allowable. Friends aggressively spotting a station during the contest is an entirely different matter. Any evidence ZF2MM requested this, no. Should this be encouraged, no. P; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00107.html (6,929 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] FW: Spotting (score: 1): Author: n5nj@gte.net (Bob Naumann - N5NJ); Date: Sat Mar 9 09:06:05 2002; Al is right on target with this issue. Such pre-arrangements are not "legal". Pre-arranging for this type of "assistance" crosses the line into "multi-operator" area. As most of these other operators; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00125.html (8,482 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] FW: Spotting (score: 1): Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG); Date: Sun Mar 10 19:43:50 2002; It seems this request (both prior to and during a contest) to "spot" someone comes all too often. I find it more than a bit unpalatable when I see it, yet I do understand it. Perhaps if more folks ma; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00182.html (10,454 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] FW: Spotting (score: 1): Author: vr2bg@harts.org.hk (VR2BrettGraham); Date: Mon Mar 11 22:56:43 2002; I'm increasingly finding that if there was a way to, I'd request folks _not_ to spot me. It used to be that before the Internet got involved, from the other side one could see how spots propagated on; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00202.html (7,217 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]