Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Feed\s+Your\s+Writer\!\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Feed Your Writer! (score: 1)
Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 12:46:00 -0700
As with last year's writeup of the ARRL DX Phone results, I am fortunate to be assisted by very able contesters from each of the ARRL Divisions, plus continental coverage, too! These guys have all th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-06/msg00131.html (8,233 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Feed Your Writer! (score: 1)
Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 23:18:25 +0000
Once again I must disagree. What "will be of more interest to everyone" is to see their calls in print -- no matter how small their scores. I'm going to suggest to my Atlantic Division "able conteste
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-06/msg00133.html (8,766 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Feed Your Writer! (score: 1)
Author: "David Thompson" <thompson@mindspring.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 23:49:37 -0400
I must agree with Bud, W2RU, that for most of us the thrill was seing out score in print. If W3XXX only worked 5 hours but made a substantial score we looked in the soapbox to see why. If K5XXX worke
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-06/msg00146.html (8,806 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Feed Your Writer! (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 08:58:39 -0400
David Thompson wrote: "I agreed with moving the ARRL section reports out of QST as it took many pages each month and most of us did not know the hams in a distant section and the info was short lived
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-06/msg00148.html (8,619 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Feed Your Writer! (score: 1)
Author: "Dale Putnam" <daleputnam@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 08:43:13 -0600
And that is exactly what is wrong, very well put Shelby. I'll leave it pretty much intact... because it needs to be attended to. The attraction is to learn about the other fellow. And in contests.. t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-06/msg00151.html (9,367 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Feed Your Writer! (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 08:22:01 -0700
Many people do not know that the USB sticks are not recommended for long term storage. They are good for only about 10k write/rewrite cycles and for about ten years. Perhaps some new technology will
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-06/msg00153.html (8,163 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Feed Your Writer! (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 08:26:35 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ** REPLY SEPARATOR ** There's no reason the soapbox couldn't be posted on the 'net. If it was, think how much easier it would be to search for a particular station. Paper has its pl
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-06/msg00154.html (8,115 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu