Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+HOGGING\s+COEFFICIENT\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] HOGGING COEFFICIENT (score: 1)
Author: Jim Neiger <n6tj@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2017 08:47:54 -0700
Matt, let's take this to an another level of absurdity. How is the new single operator 2BSIQ any less onerous? OK, I'm transmitting on only one band at a time, but the pileups that my dueling CQ's ha
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00101.html (16,328 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] HOGGING COEFFICIENT (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2017 10:59:19 -0500
Ok lets take this one step further, and it could be interesting, but how to police it? QSO Points. Points made by CQing, = 1 QSO Point Points made by S&Ping, = 2 points Thoughts? Joe WB9SBD Sig The O
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00105.html (17,519 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] HOGGING COEFFICIENT (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Apr 2017 13:03:31 -0600
In your example, you are never transmitting on 7050. In fact (and often reality), several CQers could all be announcing their listening frequency as 7050. In addition, there is nothing to stop a DX s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00108.html (10,524 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] Hogging Coefficient (score: 1)
Author: "Ken Widelitz" <widelitz@gte.net>
Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2017 10:40:09 -0700
Multi-ops should be banned because they hog a lot of operators who would otherwise be on the air as single ops using their own calls, thereby depriving the contest community of tens of thousands of p
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00109.html (6,785 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] HOGGING COEFFICIENT (score: 1)
Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2017 15:54:03 -0400
More importantly below 7128 there is less congestion because US stations cannot transmit there so there's less to work down there for DX and no real way for US stations to use those frequencies other
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00110.html (12,082 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Hogging Coefficient (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why1@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2017 13:00:02 -0700
Especially when you figure they have 2 stations per band operating at the same time, running and S&p. 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00111.html (7,913 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] HOGGING COEFFICIENT (score: 1)
Author: Matt NQ6N <matt@nq6n.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2017 16:18:15 -0500
Steve, While it's true that sometimes two stations will listen on the same frequency, I don't think this happens intentionally. It most likely a scenario where neither is able to generate rate and so
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00113.html (12,410 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] HOGGING COEFFICIENT (score: 1)
Author: Matt NQ6N <matt@nq6n.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2017 16:23:25 -0500
Joe, I think something along those lines is a great idea and would add to the number of operating strategies (and station optimization strategies) that could be used tow in. Most logs include the exa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00115.html (21,140 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] HOGGING COEFFICIENT (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2017 17:55:50 -0500
Logs yes, but not equipment, Like me, every QSO says if CW 7050 if SSB 7200 because old radio can not talk to computer. Joe WB9SBD Sig The Original Rolling Ball Clock Idle Tyme Idle-Tyme.com http://w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00116.html (23,099 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] HOGGING COEFFICIENT (score: 1)
Author: Jim Stahl via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 09:47:07 -0400
Or since were now all connected to the internet, why not after preregistering for the contest, let the central contest computer assign us all where and when we get a run frequency? So instead of K3LR
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00125.html (12,131 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] HOGGING COEFFICIENT (score: 1)
Author: K9MA <k9ma@sdellington.us>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 11:05:20 -0500
I know this is flame bait, but even without dueling CQ's, I think there's a problem. Especially when only one band is open, the band is often chock full of multi-op stations and big guns continuously
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00127.html (11,399 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] HOGGING COEFFICIENT (score: 1)
Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 20:16:43 -0400
A skilled op can find a place to call CQ. Whether or not you get an answer is a different matter entirely. If you're not reasonably loud, you probably won't get an answer. Also, a "clear" frequency s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00137.html (12,038 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu