Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+IARU\s+\-\s+Join\s+Us\s*$/: 32 ]

Total 32 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] IARU - Join Us (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 07:59:58 -0400
There has been A LOT of discussion on this reflector about the "incapability" of many to be competitive in 48 hour marathon contests. The suggestion has been made that 36 or 24 hour "categories be es
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00280.html (7,468 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU - Join Us (score: 1)
Author: "Richard DiDonna NN3W" <nn3w@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 08:24:35 -0400
Yep, and there is no excuse for the USA hams on this one. On the east coast, it starts at 8:00 am local, which means you've had a FULL night's sleep and can literally go from rack to operating chair.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00282.html (8,871 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU - Join Us (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 06:52:18 -0700
If they would allow RTTY, it would be perfect. Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinf
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00286.html (6,780 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU - Join Us (score: 1)
Author: Jim George <n3bb@mindspring.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 10:17:24 -0500
Oh my word! You must be kidding!!!!!!!! RTTY and CW are incompatible together. Jim N3BB _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00290.html (7,668 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU - Join Us (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 11:25:08 -0400
Bill Turner wrote: "If they would allow RTTY, it would be perfect." I agree! However, that would do nothing to solve the "alleged" cheating situation? Best solution, for the "alleged" cheating soluti
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00291.html (7,949 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU - Join Us (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 08:40:23 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: On Sat, 16 Jun 2007 10:17:24 -0500, Jim George <n3bb@mindspring.com> wrote: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Ok, then disallow CW. :-) Seriously, except for 40 meters, CW and RTTY normally use d
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00292.html (7,855 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU - Join Us (score: 1)
Author: mike dol dormann <w7dra@juno.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 10:12:32 -0700
too bad IARU does not come before field day, then we could use IARU to check out rigs, antennas, etc, getting ready for the BIG one. mike w7dra _______________________________________________ CQ-Cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00296.html (7,766 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU - Join Us (score: 1)
Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@dandy.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 17:10:07 +0000
With a straight face, try telling that to we who've recently competed in CW tests when there was a Ratty test going on at the same time. While 40 is the worst place for both, 20 has also been nearly
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00297.html (9,703 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU - Join Us (score: 1)
Author: "hank k8dd" <k8dd@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 16:01:03 -0400
And on 80M put RTTY back above 3600? 73 Hank K8DD -- 'Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level then beat you with experience.' -anon -- ___________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00299.html (8,845 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU - Join Us (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 15:50:52 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: On Sat, 16 Jun 2007 16:01:03 -0400, "hank k8dd" <k8dd@arrl.net> wrote: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- You don't need to "put" RTTY anywhere. CW and RTTY have a nearly identical bandwidth and a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00300.html (8,247 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU - Join Us (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 19:31:50 -0700
Forty meters is actually the only band where RTTY and CW mingle. As people have said over and over again. some countries CAN'T work RTTY up high in the band on 40, that is why they congregate around
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00301.html (9,136 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU - Join Us (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 08:15:31 -0500 (CDT)
What I would really like to see happen is the 40 meer band expanded down to 6900 worldwide, and either move CW into the new 100 kHz letting the digi stations move down to 7000, or let the digi statio
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00304.html (10,144 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU - Join Us (score: 1)
Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@dandy.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 16:25:13 +0000
All the radio manufacturers would be delighted; they'd get to sell thousands of new HF radios. All we who still use good ole radios with bandswitches would be mainly SOL and POed to high heaven ;o\ ;
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00311.html (9,500 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU - Join Us (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 18:40:44 -0500 (CDT)
I guess not everyone has a TS-440 or TS-850. By clipping or switching a couple diodes I get full SW transmit capability. I only use it for the 60 meter band on HF, which wasn't a ham band when the ri
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00318.html (10,012 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU - Join Us (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 08:43:06 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: On Sat, 16 Jun 2007 17:10:07 +0000, Steve Harrison <k0xp@dandy.net> wrote: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- That is a problem of scheduling, not of modes. CW and RTTY have essentially the same b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00330.html (9,303 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU - Join Us (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 09:07:51 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: On Sat, 16 Jun 2007 23:46:53 -0500, "Dale Martin" <kg5u@hal-pc.org> wrote: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Nonsense. In my experience, RTTY operators are by far the most courteous on the air. I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00332.html (9,318 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU - Join Us (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 09:14:29 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 22:05:16 -0500, Jim George <n3bb@mindspring.com> wrote: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- With its 170 Hz shift, including sidebands, RTY occupies about 250-300 Hz of spectrum
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00333.html (9,297 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU - Join Us (score: 1)
Author: "hank k8dd" <k8dd@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 16:31:00 -0400
And ..... RTTY ops generally (notice I said generally, not always or usually) don't listen aurally to a frequency - it's kinda like they don't see much on their little display and they just plop thei
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00334.html (10,316 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU - Join Us (score: 1)
Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@dandy.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 00:21:17 +0000
For sure. And then during a contest, there's a bunch of them calling what must be a CQer and they smear all around the CQer, taking up lots more than just 170 Hz. During a contest, you can't. During
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00338.html (10,046 bytes)

20. [CQ-Contest] IARU - Join Us (score: 1)
Author: "Glenn VA3DX" <va3dx@sympatico.ca>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 20:40:53 -0400
Gee I thought only K8's " GENERALLY " were poor ops... How can you categorize a whole group of operators just by your assumptions ??? You could easily apply this to CW or SSB , depending on which con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00341.html (9,525 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu