Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+KU1CW\s+location\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+KU1CW\s+location\s*$/: 57 ]

Total 57 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] KU1CW location (score: 1): Author: W4AAW@xxxxxxx via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 16:30:36 -0400; Here is the correct information on KU1CW in the CQWPX CW contest. 1. Alex has just moved to Washington State. He has not yet modified his license to reflect this recent development. 2. Alex is a memb; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00021.html (8,368 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] KU1CW location (score: 1): Author: Drew Vonada-Smith <drew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 15:54:29 -0500; All, I can reliably state that Alex KU1CW is *NOT* in Kansas anymore. He has been in W7 land for about three years now. I believe he is in the process of moving from OR to WA, or vice versa..no; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00023.html (7,637 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] KU1CW location (score: 1): Author: Paul O'Kane <pokane@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 04:25:19 +0100; <snip> 2. ... We have 31 team members who operate W4AAW's positions from all over NA, from Panama, Europe and Asia, provided they meet legal/licensing requirements. My information is that such team-W; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00027.html (8,449 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] KU1CW location (score: 1): Author: Shelby Summerville <shelbyk4ww@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 07:11:06 -0400; W4AAW wrote: "We remote-capable stations are not trying to fool anyone or gain some sort of geographical or unfair advantage." IMHO, with the exception of those living in antenna restricted communiti; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00028.html (9,161 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] KU1CW location (score: 1): Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 08:48:50 -0400; That's a huge exception you've carved out, Shelby. As a brand new member of the W4AAW team, we could examine my motives: 1. The concept interests me technically; Mike's an extraordinarily diligent an; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00029.html (10,548 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] KU1CW location (score: 1): Author: Ed K1EP <k1ep.list@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 07:34:29 -0400; W4AAW wrote: "We remote-capable stations are not trying to fool anyone or gain some sort of geographical or unfair advantage." IMHO, with the exception of those living in antenna restricted communiti; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00030.html (9,611 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] KU1CW location (score: 1): Author: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>; Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 15:08:10 +0200; If I would operate a remote station based in the U.S. it will be a legal operation since CEPT reciprocal licensing applies. Reference: FCC Part 97 : Sec. 97.107 Alien control operator privileges 73 P; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00032.html (8,395 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] KU1CW location (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 08:50:43 -0500; Yeah, when I saw Alex at Dayton, I didn't think to ask where he lived now. We're Facebook friends and he sent me a message that he was in Oregon for a few years and in Washington for about a month no; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00033.html (10,921 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] KU1CW location (score: 1): Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 12:06:44 -0600; Shelby, You're right. Let's discourage guys from getting on the air in contests. Contesting and amateur radio are growing too fast and the bands are way too crowded without all the thousands of remot; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00034.html (11,614 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] KU1CW location (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 20:53:21 +0000; I AGREE! There are especially too many operators on from North Korea. They are even clogging up .52 simplex here. 73 John AF5CC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00037.html (13,591 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] KU1CW location (score: 1): Author: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>; Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2017 21:23:34 +0000; I take the comment, "we remote-capable stations are not trying to fool anyone or gain some sort of geographical or unfair advantage" to mean that most remote operators are upfront about where their s; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00040.html (8,774 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] KU1CW location (score: 1): Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2017 20:57:32 +0000; Hi Peter, I asked this very question of ARRL regulatory and they said that CEPT only applies to "boots on the ground" operations, meaning you have to actually be physically present here. Furthermore,; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00042.html (10,105 bytes)
13. Re: [CQ-Contest] KU1CW location (score: 1): Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 17:53:29 -0400; There is really nothing wrong with trying to gain an advantage during a contest. That's what contesting is. As long as it is within the rules. Operating from elsewhere to do better in contests has b; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00043.html (11,076 bytes)
14. Re: [CQ-Contest] KU1CW location (score: 1): Author: "Stephen Bloom" <sbloom@acsalaska.net>; Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2017 19:28:38 -0800; BTW: Though my only objection to remoting now is that ...Multi Ops still seem to me to be more fun in person .. The U.S. folks ..especially those not on the East Coast would be amazed by how active t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00046.html (14,786 bytes)
15. Re: [CQ-Contest] KU1CW location (score: 1): Author: <w5ov@w5ov.com>; Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 08:07:23 -0400; " Just be careful that you are indeed doing so. CEPT T/R 61-01 is not sufficient authorization for a European licensee to operate an internet remote base in the US while being physically present over; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00047.html (12,480 bytes)
16. Re: [CQ-Contest] KU1CW location (score: 1): Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2017 12:25:35 +0000; Hello Bob, You are incorrect about this one. The terms of the home license do also apply. The relevant regulation is 97.107 (b), particularly (1) and (2) 97.107: ... The privileges granted to a contr; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00048.html (16,565 bytes)
17. Re: [CQ-Contest] KU1CW location (score: 1): Author: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>; Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 16:51:10 +0100; Earlier in this thread, W4AAW claimed that "We have 31 team members who operate W4AAW's positions from all over NA, from Panama, Europe and Asia, provided they meet legal/licensing requirements". I'm; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00053.html (9,148 bytes)
18. Re: [CQ-Contest] KU1CW location (score: 1): Author: Peter Bowyer <peter@bowyer.org>; Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 17:02:20 +0100; Sorry Bob you're wrong there. FCC has adopted the CEPT T/R 61-01 regulation to make reciprocal licensing easier. http://www.arrl.org/foreign-licenses-operating-in-u-s Peter G4MJS ____________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00055.html (14,306 bytes)
19. Re: [CQ-Contest] KU1CW location (score: 1): Author: Peter Bowyer <peter@bowyer.org>; Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 17:53:28 +0100; Well if you're operating remotely from outside the US, it doesn't - which is a good part of the point here. The CEPT regulation is written such that it covers the physical presence of a foreign-licen; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00056.html (17,972 bytes)
20. Re: [CQ-Contest] KU1CW location (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 12:16:09 -0500; That was the April 2015 issue, maybe that was the ARRLs "April Fools" article for that year! 73 John AF5CC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contestin; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00058.html (10,258 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]