Hi Peter,
I asked this very question of ARRL regulatory and they said that CEPT only
applies to "boots on the ground" operations, meaning you have to actually
be physically present here. Furthermore, even if it did allow operation
you do need to obey your home license power limits and frequency allocation
not to exceed those of US extra class. So if your country only has a 400,
500 or 1 kW limit you cannot use 1.5kw here for example.
N2RJ
On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 1:57 PM Peter Voelpel <dj7ww@t-online.de> wrote:
> If I would operate a remote station based in the U.S. it will be a legal
> operation since CEPT reciprocal licensing applies.
>
> Reference: FCC Part 97 : Sec. 97.107 Alien control operator privileges
>
> 73
> Peter, DJ7WW
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
> Paul O'Kane
> Sent: Samstag, 3. Juni 2017 05:25
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] KU1CW location
>
> On 02/06/2017 21:30, W4AAW@aol.com via CQ-Contest wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > 2. ... We have 31 team members who operate W4AAW's positions from all
> over
> NA, from Panama, Europe and Asia, provided they meet legal/licensing
> requirements.
>
> My information is that such team-W4AAW contest entries, with
> remote operator(s) not physically located on US territory and
> not in possession of personal US licences, are in contravention
> of the US legal/licensing requirements for remote operation.
>
> It seems to me that contest entries which include unlicensed
> or unlawful operation should be disallowed, and struck from the
> records.
>
>
> ---
> Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|