Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Legalities\s+and\s+ethics\s+of\s+international\s+remote\s+operation\?\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Legalities and ethics of international remote operation? (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 11:27:46 -0700
On Saturday afternoon, during the 10m contest, I was surprised to be called by a very loud YO4. Condx were such that the band was not open to central/eastern EU here in Colorado at that time. Given t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00275.html (7,513 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Legalities and ethics of international remote operation? (score: 1)
Author: Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 13:58:35 -0700
If the transmitter is on our soil then it cannot ID with a "bare" YO4xx call sign, regardless of where the operator has his BIC. 73, de Hans, K0HB/K7 _______________________________________________ C
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00278.html (8,302 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Legalities and ethics of international remote operation? (score: 1)
Author: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 21:29:49 +0000
On Saturday afternoon, during the 10m contest, I was surprised to be called by a very loud YO4. Condx were such that the band was not open to central/eastern EU here in Colorado at that time. Given t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00280.html (9,556 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Legalities and ethics of international remote operation? (score: 1)
Author: "Alan M. Eshleman" <doctore@well.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 14:33:13 -0800 (PST)
I got the same call. It seemed fishy... 73, Alan/K6SRZ -- Original Message -- From: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com> To: "Barry" <w2up@comcast.net> Cc: cq-contest@contesting.com Sent: Tuesday, Decemb
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00284.html (9,999 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Legalities and ethics of international remote operation? (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 15:26:02 -0700
Yes, I was called by the same guy. After he gave me his exchange, I asked "YO ?" and he said yes. Bull. Glad I worked a real YO on Sunday. I would hate to get credit for a wake multiplier. 73, Steve,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00285.html (9,406 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Legalities and ethics of international remote operation? (score: 1)
Author: Don Field <don.field@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 22:48:09 +0000
CEPT has nothing to do with it - for operations under the CEPT agreement, the operator must be in the same country as the transmitter. The difficulty here is that rules for remote operation vary from
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00286.html (9,366 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Legalities and ethics of international remote operation? (score: 1)
Author: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 20:19:54 -0500
This is going to be a challenge for contesting and DXing in the future. DXpeditions have been reporting these "unusual" QSOs for a few years now. We are now beginning to see them in contesting. There
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00288.html (10,993 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Legalities and ethics of international remote operation? (score: 1)
Author: LB3RE LJ3RE Stein-Roar Brobakken <post@lb3re.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 00:21:25 +0100
Hi Yes, it same with this many remote stations in states and few European countries which not care about borders of DXCC or that CEPT is not valid for Remote. Same happen during IARU HF championship
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00289.html (10,871 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Legalities and ethics of international remote operation? (score: 1)
Author: LB3RE LJ3RE Stein-Roar Brobakken <post@lb3re.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 00:34:27 +0100
Well, they cheating in DXCC and contest. Its the beginning of the end of DXCC program. Its become $$$ buisness to rent out HF remote,  any non ham can use a station without control operator with a va
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00290.html (10,746 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Legalities and ethics of international remote operation? (score: 1)
Author: David Siddall <hhamwv@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 18:27:08 -0500
Barry, FCC Part 97 requires that the YO operator MUST sign indicating the location in the U.S., you are correct. Otherwise, if signing W2/ (or whatever), it probably would have been perfectly legal u
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00291.html (14,544 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Legalities and ethics of international remote operation? (score: 1)
Author: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 02:57:01 +0000
Just out of curiosity, is there a specific citation for the "an FCC licensee...MUST use his or her FCC license" bit? I wouldn't be surprised if some visitors who get US tickets might not be aware of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00299.html (10,663 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Legalities and ethics of international remote operation? (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 21:12:59 -0700
Why does everyone assume he was running a remote station? It seems much more likely to me that he was just some stateside knucklehead bootlegging a YO4 callsign in order to drum up activity. Dave AB7
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00300.html (10,414 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Legalities and ethics of international remote operation? (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 23:32:15 -0500
Technology does not make people cheat; they cheat because they want to. That YO op would cheat some other way if remote was not there . Remote transmitters are obvious cheats. You can cheat by connec
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00304.html (13,603 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Legalities and ethics of international remote operation? (score: 1)
Author: David Siddall <hhamwv@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 06:41:27 -0500
Michael -- FCC Radio Amateur Rules, Part 97.107. "... No citizen of the United States or person holding an FCC amateur operator/primary station license grant is eligible for the reciprocal operating
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00313.html (12,224 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Legalities and ethics of international remote operation? (score: 1)
Author: Kevan Nason <knason00@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 08:32:07 -0500
Haven't read the rules in detail (at work on break and not enough time!), but wouldn't there be some responsibility for the operator of the remote station (which is a transmitter here in the U.S. ope
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00316.html (10,680 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Legalities and ethics of international remote operation? (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 10:35:26 -0500
Hi Kevin, When an operator is controlling a remote station in the US, that operator IS the control operator, and is responsible. It is not a repeater station, and repeater rules don't apply. Mic or K
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00322.html (11,735 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu