A contest first? A new level of transparent contesting? We've all seen webcams from various stations, but wouldn't it be more interesting if you could hear what the ops were hearing in their headphon
Randy: What a cool idea! This will give all us hayseeds in the Black Hole an idea of what you gul-durned Yankees can hear on the radio (that we can't). Seriously, you should get the arrl to post this
Seems that upload bandwidth would be a major limiting factor. How many concurrent streams can you handle, albeit at a low bitrate? -- Craig - N7OR _______________________________________________ CQ-C
Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 12:03:07 -0700
If another competitive stations listens to this audio stream during the contest, and they happen to be more than 500 meters away from station K5ZD, they are violating the CQWW rules' ban on the use o
True. Anyone who does this probably uses packet illegally too, a far greater problem. Sure, I can preserve the IP logs if that is of interest to those who care about such things. But put it in perspe
This interpretation is really extreme. And to make it even worse, he goes on and on and on......... So............. What are you going to do with the information? Can you work the stations on the sam
Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 12:51:40 -0700
That's not how I see this being useful to another station. I can easily imagine a multiop in Virginia or Illinois or Florida or someplace having an "Internet" station where an op not on the air could
WM5R said: > I can easily imagine a multiop in Virginia or Illinois or Florida or someplace having an "Internet" station where an op not on the air could be listening to Internet audio streams to hea
You can't encourage ethical and civilized behavior by stomping out technology. Contesting, to a large extent, is a sport based on mutual trust. Anyone who wins by less than noble means is a loser. T
Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 13:44:39 -0700
Let's say that there is an ethical way for a remote receiver to be used. Perhaps the utility of this kind of remote receiver for gaining an unfair competitive advantage is so low that its use for ent
Randy I think if you are going to do this, this is really neat, but next time, just wait till about 5 minutes before the contest starts and then put it on the reflector so it won't get nit-picked to
If the op is wasting time listening to some internet radio he is not making contacts! I applaud the effort to allow us to listen in on a top notch station. It will allow many a chance to experience a
Define use. The remote station is not in control of the receiver and has no knowledge of the frequency in use. --Original Message-- From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@