Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Logging\s+question\s*$/: 54 ]

Total 54 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: "KU7Y" <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 20:15:53 -0500
When we lived in ID several of us would get together each week or so and talk about DX. One time someone mentioned they got a DX QSL that was blank.... no QSO data filled in. There was a note to plea
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00049.html (11,566 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Dougherty \(W2IRT\)" <contesting@w2irt.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 19:42:07 -0400
I'm mostly with Ed on this one. I've had a few emails requesting that I check my log, etc. My standard reply is that if it was a contest QSO then please be patient and wait until the contest log subm
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00050.html (10,573 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 16:21:27 -0700
I'm sorry to hear that you won't use LOTW -- whatever your objections (and this one is VERY picky) -- LOTW saves everyone who needs a DX QSL from you an average of $3.50 per card, a dollar figure tha
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00053.html (9,179 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 08:35:18 -0600
Maybe you should rethink that policy considering you don't apply that rule when YOU request a QSL card. You do request a paper card from stations that don't put their log on LoTW, so why won't you re
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00054.html (9,307 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: "Chuck Milam, N9KY" <N9KY@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 13:19:08 -0500
And not possible on LoTW - one of the reasons I will not use it. -- Chuck Milam, N9KY N9KY@arrl.net _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00055.html (8,485 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@twc.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 17:20:01 -0400
I've followed this thread with some interest, and until today, it had never happened to me. Today, I received, via email, the following: "I write you because, after my electronic log was broken, I ca
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00058.html (9,263 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 23:14:34 -0500
Hi Shelby, Whatchyagonnado? This isnt really a problem, is it? You worked the guy and he appears to have a credible reason for asking. If it was four years ago, no contest results will be affected. I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00061.html (10,461 bytes)

28. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 21:39:42 -0700 (PDT)
This is a no-brainer. He's in your log.  Send him a card. __73, de Hans, K0HB "Just a Boy and His Radio" happened to me. Today, I received, via email, the following: "I write you because, after my el
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00062.html (8,958 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 08:03:56 -0500
I'm not fully sure of the actual situation here, but it appears he is asking for a correction for a QSL, not a correction to the log you submitted to the contest sponsor. For QSLing, a lot of people
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00063.html (12,289 bytes)

30. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: "George Harlem" <george.harlem@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 10:10:52 -0400
As is the practice of not sending a card unless the other ham also puts his log on LoTW. Huh? George W1EBI _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesti
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00064.html (8,111 bytes)

31. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:57:47 -0700 (PDT)
No, I wouldn't agree with that, George. I participate fully in LoTW as a courtesy to others, but my preference is paper cards.  I would not withhold a real QSL contingent on your use of LoTW. __73, d
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00065.html (8,995 bytes)

32. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Dougherty \(W2IRT\)" <contesting@w2irt.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 20:24:11 -0400
There's a big difference between a top-10 entity like KP1 and a station in the lower-48. I would happily change my DX log (after the contest log submission period is over) if I was close and messed u
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00066.html (13,587 bytes)

33. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 19:24:37 -0700
On Fri,8/7/2015 7:10 AM, George Harlem wrote: This is a no-brainer. As is the practice of not sending a card unless the other ham also puts his log on LoTW. Huh? Back in the day when you and I were f
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00067.html (11,426 bytes)

34. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de>
Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 09:43:18 +0200
Jim, Back in the day when you and I were first licensed, we mailed QSLs as postcards with 2 cent stamps. I sent you a card, you sent me one. We each paid for our own stamp. A QSL was considered "the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00068.html (11,031 bytes)

35. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: Christian Schneider <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2015 09:48:00 +0200
A QSL is something different than a match in a database. To probe this, one may pin LotW matches on the wall at a public hamradio presentation. We may not share different opinions and preferences abo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00069.html (8,905 bytes)

36. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: George Harlem <george.harlem@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 10:47:56 -0400
Hans, you missed my sarcasm. Perhaps I should have said it is ridiculous to require that a ham asking "PSE QSL" on his card must also put his log on LoTW in order to deserve a card in return. LoTW us
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00072.html (10,427 bytes)

37. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 07:50:58 -0700
If you think the Bureau system is "superb" you probably don't use it. The Bureau system is essentially broken. MANY hams do not participate, some countries do not have bureaus, and it is VERY VERY sl
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00074.html (11,205 bytes)

38. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: "George Harlem" <george.harlem@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 10:57:39 -0400
Yes, pretty simple, Jim. But I happen to feel that it's unreasonable to refuse a courteous request for a card for a valid QSO simply to make that point. George W1EBI his log on LoTW. Huh? Back in the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00075.html (11,533 bytes)

39. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: Brett Graham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2015 14:56:10 +0000
And not possible on LoTW - one of the reasons I will not use it. If I bust the other guy's call, I don't get to figure out my mistake. Or if the other guy made one. I don't believe LoTW confirms eve
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00076.html (8,983 bytes)

40. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de>
Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 18:24:49 +0200
Jim, If you think the Bureau system is "superb" you probably don't use it. I do since I became a radio amateur some 26 years ago, that's why I am of the opinion! But maybe it's in better general use
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00078.html (10,743 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]
This search system is powered by Namazu