- 1. [CQ-Contest] Moral outrage (score: 1)
- Author: Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 09:06:54 -0700
- I intend to boycott the California QSO Party. SSTV cannot participate. Do you think theyll miss me? 73, de Hans, K0HB -- 73, de Hans, K0HB -- "Just a boy and his radio" ______________________________
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-01/msg00106.html (7,239 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Moral outrage (score: 1)
- Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 11:10:00 -0500
- Theres really no comparison. There is **NO** accusation whatsoever that SSTV is not real radio or computers talking to computers or destroying ham radio. ALL of these claims have been leveled against
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-01/msg00107.html (7,679 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Moral outrage (score: 1)
- Author: Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 10:26:47 -0700
- First a disclaimer, Rita. I made some 4,000 Qs last year. About 2,000 were digital, and most of those were FT8. I am not accusing FT8 of any nefarious mission aimed at destroying Amateur Radio. All H
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-01/msg00111.html (9,126 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Moral outrage (score: 1)
- Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 13:49:02 -0500
- Only if they don't improve their aim, Hans... <g> 73 I intend to boycott the California QSO Party. SSTV cannot participate. Do you think theyll miss me? 73, de Hans, K0HB -- 73, de Hans, K0HB -- "Jus
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-01/msg00113.html (8,278 bytes)
- 5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Moral outrage (score: 1)
- Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 16:51:36 -0500
- Anything you can't hear with your human ears isn't real radio. At least with digital modes such as RTTY you can hear something. In many FT8 contacts the signal might be as much as 20db below the nois
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-01/msg00116.html (9,919 bytes)
- 6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Moral outrage (score: 1)
- Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 21:18:30 -0700
- I have no dog in the FT8 battles here, but that's a phenomenally ridiculous assertion. Dave AB7E _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com ht
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-01/msg00118.html (8,223 bytes)
- 7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Moral outrage (score: 1)
- Author: "rjairam@gmail.com" <rjairam@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 04:45:09 -0500
- To me its wonderful that radio amateurs have developed tech that can decode signals below the noise floor. This is truly advancing the radio art. Just like when they discovered that frequencies 200
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-01/msg00119.html (11,585 bytes)
- 8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Moral outrage (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Rhodes <jimk0xu@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 06:17:18 -0600
- Then I would suggest to you that you not participate. Go sulk in your cave. Personally I do enjoy some of these modes. Especially those that are "buried in the noise". At my urban QTH noise is someti
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-01/msg00121.html (11,472 bytes)
- 9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Moral outrage (score: 1)
- Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 08:56:16 -0800
- For another perspective, read the P49X 3830 soapbox for ARRL RTTY Roundup. Ed W0YK _________________________________________________________________ Anything you can't hear with your human ears isn'
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-01/msg00122.html (11,240 bytes)
- 10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Moral outrage (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 11:20:56 -0800
- This statement assumes that "real radio" is defined ONLY by the human operator as he/she sits in front of a "real radio," while ignoring the contribution of the antenna system(s), the other equipment
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-01/msg00123.html (9,808 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu