Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+More\s+Sprints\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+More\s+Sprints\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] More sprints (score: 1): Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>; Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 14:56:52 -0600; Hi all, FWIW, I think additional sprints are a great idea. And I also don't think that proponents of a CW sprint should be forced to also create and manage phone or RTTY contests. But if anyone wants; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00045.html (6,895 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] More sprints (score: 1): Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca>; Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 17:58:52 -0600; Hi all, Not to put too fine a point on it, but all anyone needs to do to get more sprints going is agree to organize it... I'd love the idea. Don't have the time myself, but it seems to me that organ; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00192.html (9,372 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] More sprints (score: 1): Author: Tom Horton <k5iid@ntelos.net>; Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 01:46:22 +0000; Kelly is absolutely right! After the PA QSO party, someone suggested that there should be a contest for the Mid-Atlantic states. This past month the rules for the Mid-Atlantic QSO Party were released; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00194.html (11,707 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] More sprints (score: 1): Author: "Jim Stevens" <k4ma@nc.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 22:58:07 -0500; As far as SSB Sprint is concerned, I would be willing to do the log checking for at least one more Sprint. I do think we have to be careful when and how many we schedule because Sprints tend to be mo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00197.html (11,489 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] More sprints (score: 1): Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com; Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 10:56:08 EST; My Input: Quarterly Sprint, two on Saturday night, two on Sunday night. Paul K5AF -- The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland! THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VH; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00202.html (8,474 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] More sprints (score: 1): Author: Jeff Stai WK6I <wk6i@twistedoak.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 10:31:52 -0800; One for each mode - CW, RTTY, Phone. "Traditional", no name swapping. I still like the idea of 15/10/6 Sprint, perhaps to run earlier (10AM to 2PM pacific?) on a Sunday in late June/early July. I wou; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00206.html (9,642 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] More Sprints (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 15:09:01 -0500; My vote would be for two additional CW sprints, one per quarter, but keeping the number of phone sprints as it is now, in recognition of the greater disruption that the phone sprints cause on the ban; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00207.html (8,945 bytes)
8. RE: [CQ-Contest] More sprints (score: 1): Author: "Felipe J. Hernandez" <felipe@isla.net>; Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 17:03:04 -0400; 15-10-6 ,talk about some weird propagation and complete advantage to some people... One for each mode - CW, RTTY, Phone. "Traditional", no name swapping. I still like the idea of 15/10/6 Sprint, perh; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00208.html (10,778 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] More sprints (score: 1): Author: Brian Moran <brianmo@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 17:04:36 -0800 (PST); I volunteer to help out with an additional Sprint in the next 4 months; it would be great to have a group of people composed of 1) At least someone who's put one on before 2) More volunteers and acce; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00210.html (9,116 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] More sprints (score: 1): Author: "Bob Wruble" <w7gg@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 18:28:02 -0800; bring it on!! everyone has an advantage at one time or another..... east coast, left coast and no coast, hi band, lo band no band u name it,,,,,,de w7gg 2PM be Pentiums -- The world's top contesters; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00212.html (12,368 bytes)
11. [CQ-Contest] More Sprints (score: 1): Author: "Larry Schimelpfenig" <k7sv@adelphia.net>; Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 05:29:24 -0500; Respecting the fact that the circumstances under which we all live differ, I can understand the desire on the part of some to make changes to additional Sprints if they were to occur. Having said tha; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00214.html (9,725 bytes)
12. [CQ-Contest] More Sprints (score: 1): Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com; Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 08:10:46 EST; 1. I don't get the idea of doing it on 6 10 and 15. I want to work a Sprint with some rate, not a VHF contest. There's some consistency with propagation on the currently used bands....de K7SV I agree; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00215.html (9,580 bytes)
13. Re: [CQ-Contest] More Sprints (score: 1): Author: Jeff Stai WK6I <wk6i@twistedoak.com>; Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:44:10 -0800; The idea was to run this one during a time when sporadic E propagation would be likely - there's no reason for it to be boring: you have the added enjoyment of riding the capricious winds of propagat; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00218.html (9,971 bytes)
14. RE: [CQ-Contest] More Sprints (score: 1): Author: "Mike Fatchett" <mike@mallardcove.com>; Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 12:55:34 -0700; As a "Phone" guy who dabbles in CW I would like to see equal numbers of both. I can't agree with the statement about running out of stations to work. There were many of us low power limited stations; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00219.html (11,361 bytes)
15. Re: [CQ-Contest] More Sprints (score: 1): Author: "Leigh S. Jones" <kr6x@kr6x.com>; Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 22:09:31 -0800; This is the kind of discussion I like to hear on here. Plenty of ideas, often conflicting ideas to be sure, but everyone has ideas. Well, there are a lot of contests now; if we try creating another c; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00225.html (10,101 bytes)
16. Re: [CQ-Contest] More Sprints (score: 1): Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com; Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 10:08:10 EST; Gang, I think this idea has been floated before, but part of the problem of a busy contest calendar is the number of state QSO parties. Perhaps combining these into regional contests with separate sc; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00232.html (8,631 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]