Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Multi\s+2\s+locking\s+device\?\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Multi 2 locking device? (score: 1)
Author: "Fco. Luis Delgadillo" <xe2b@outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 18:03:29 +0000
Hola, I'm planning to operate M2 LP, the oncoming contest season. I do have two WX0B passbands filters from my previous SO2R setup. -Only two radios will be used. and - Very simple antennas setup on
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-01/msg00053.html (7,078 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Multi 2 locking device? (score: 1)
Author: Jukka Klemola <jpklemola@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 20:31:35 +0200
For M2, you do not need a PTT interlocking device if you use two radios. If you use two radios per band, then you need a PTT interlock for those two radios on each band. If you use a third radio for
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-01/msg00054.html (8,978 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Multi 2 locking device? (score: 1)
Author: Jukka Klemola <jpklemola@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 20:34:01 +0200
Oh .. and about operating on the same band.. You use LP. If you have separate antennas for each radio, you should have no problems. If you want to share the antennas, I do not know of any commercial
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-01/msg00055.html (9,312 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Multi 2 locking device? (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 19:27:31 -0700
His concern was so that station 1 and station 2 would never end up on the same band at the same time. Does N1MM+ have software lock outs for this? W0MU If you want to share the antennas, I do not kno
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-01/msg00056.html (10,275 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Multi 2 locking device? (score: 1)
Author: Kostas SV1DPI <sv1dpi@otenet.gr>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 08:22:23 +0200
Also there no LP category. Only HP, so M2 is not a wise decision. I know 3 devices: 1) 4o3a http://www.4o3a.com/index.php/products/station-automation/lock-x/ and for inband use http://www.4o3a.com/in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-01/msg00057.html (10,713 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Multi 2 locking device? (score: 1)
Author: Maarten van R <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 14:30:31 +0000
Hi Luis, You could use a 6 pack to prevent two radios on one band. https://www.arraysolutions.com/sixpak-so-dual-rc 73, Maarten PD2R _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-01/msg00058.html (9,840 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Multi 2 locking device? (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Gauthier \(K8UT\)" <K8UT@charter.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 09:32:32 -0500
I was confused by Luis's intentions because of his "burned front ends" comment. - Prevent the two radios from transmitting simultaneously (regardless of band)? - Prevent the two stations from transmi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-01/msg00060.html (12,139 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Multi 2 locking device? (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 11:27:36 -0500
One somewhat expensive solution is to use a triplexer and then feed each bands coax into a 2x6 relay box such as a SixPak. The relay box makes it physically impossible for both radios to connect on t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-01/msg00061.html (8,880 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Multi 2 locking device? (score: 1)
Author: kostas sv1dpi <sv1dpi@otenet.gr>
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2017 00:30:46 +0200
I forgot to mention also Op Swapper from TopTen devices. It is similar with 2S1 but in much better price. See http://www.qth.com/topten/os.htm Acom 2S1 and TopTen OpSwapper shares the same antenna to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-01/msg00063.html (13,299 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Multi 2 locking device? (score: 1)
Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2017 16:19:00 +0500
1) Two LP on different bands with different antennas - use http://microham.com/contents/en-us/d75.html or http://quad.ru/production/switchSO2R.php The latter has better port isolation. WX0B six pack
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-01/msg00066.html (12,454 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu