Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+NAQP\s+multi\-2\s+strategy\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+NAQP\s+multi\-2\s+strategy\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] NAQP multi-2 strategy (score: 1): Author: John Unger <w4au@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 10:07:32 -0500; I am thinking of try M/2 in the NAQP in January. I've read over the rules, which seem pretty straightforward and understandable, but what I don't know is the best general strategy to follow. The triv; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-11/msg00312.html (8,470 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP multi-2 strategy (score: 1): Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 11:51:57 -0600; John, Take the same operation that goes on in a successful M/2 operation in a DX contest, including two rigs at each station, skimmer, etc. Turn off the amplifiers and you are ready to go. Stan, K5GO; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-11/msg00319.html (9,503 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP multi-2 strategy (score: 1): Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com; Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 17:31:30 -0500 (EST); But there is a significant rule difference: In NAQP you have to stay on a band for ten minutes. In the DX contests, you can QSY, work a couple of multipliers (or others) and then QSY without the 10 m; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-11/msg00322.html (7,835 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP multi-2 strategy (score: 1): Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 16:49:40 -0700; In NAQP you have to stay on a band for ten minutes. I'm not personally experienced with the optimum strategy under current NAQP rules, but from perusing past results it seems that NAQP multis often d; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-11/msg00323.html (7,959 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP multi-2 strategy (score: 1): Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>; Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 18:41:22 -0600; In NAQP you have to stay on a band for ten minutes. I'm not personally experienced with the optimum strategy under current NAQP rules, but from perusing past results it seems that NAQP multis often d; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-11/msg00328.html (8,955 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP multi-2 strategy (score: 1): Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 21:27:35 -0700; True somewhat, But if you have say 1000 Q's right now, and you work that one guy on Ten, you just gained 1000 more points for that ten minutes. What are the odds against you working on that original; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-11/msg00333.html (8,123 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP multi-2 strategy (score: 1): Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 04:45:15 -0600; Actually the top score will have about 1800 contacts and about 300 multipliers. In this example one multiplier equals 6 QSOs. If it is late in the contest, the rates have slowed, the excitement of wo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-11/msg00336.html (8,926 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]