Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+New\s+Mult\s+for\s+SS\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+New\s+Mult\s+for\s+SS\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] New Mult for SS (score: 1): Author: Bill kollenbaum via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2020 07:51:37 +0000 (UTC); If you think it's a challenge from the Mid-Atlantic region, consider what it's like from W6. Any changes to contest rules that increase the advantage of east coast contesters seems to be OK with HQ!; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-01/msg00053.html (6,984 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] New Mult for SS (score: 1): Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2020 10:30:51 -0500; "Any changes to contest rules that increase the advantage of east coast contesters seems to be OK with HQ!" Oh come on, ARRL HQ has absolutely no say in the internal organizational decisions of the R; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-01/msg00054.html (8,302 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] New Mult for SS (score: 1): Author: "Bob Shohet, KQ2M" <kq2m@kq2m.com>; Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2020 10:45:46 -0500; Umm... there is NO advantage for the East coast (especially New England) contesters in SS compared to the Midwest, Great Plains, South, Southwest or West. Its actually the WORST place to be for that; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-01/msg00055.html (7,885 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] New Mult for SS (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2020 10:04:31 -0800; Bob, Perhaps you (and others who don't understand) should operate SS as a guest from W6. AND SS is not the only contest with RAC sections as mults. There's ARRL 160, which the east coast views as a D; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-01/msg00062.html (10,717 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] New Mult for SS (score: 1): Author: "Bob Shohet, KQ2M" <kq2m@kq2m.com>; Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2020 14:53:50 -0500; Jim, Your reply indicates that you not read or understand my brief post before commenting on it. And then you truncated it and ignored the rest in your reply. I have put in bold parts of my post to e; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-01/msg00065.html (14,500 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] New Mult for SS (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2020 21:05:47 -0800; Your reply indicates that you not read or understand my brief post before commenting on it. And then you truncated it and ignored the rest in your reply. I have put in bold parts of my post to emphas; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-01/msg00067.html (22,010 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] New Mult for SS (score: 1): Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>; Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2020 11:38:12 -0400; I take strong issue with this particular statement you are purporting as fact Jim.(the statement from your previous post which I clipped and pasted below) I just uploaded my 2019 logs to clublog.org; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-01/msg00068.html (10,455 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] New Mult for SS (score: 1): Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>; Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2020 12:25:26 -0400; p.p.s- Any of you wondering about my facts I quoted below need not even take my word for it. Not at all. Please venture over to VOACAP online and punch in the #'s between VE9 and N. W6 and see for yo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-01/msg00069.html (11,373 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] New Mult for SS (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2020 09:04:47 -0800; Yes, Mike. But you're one station in one Section. What about the other sections with few hams? That's N4ZR's point. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing lis; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-01/msg00070.html (8,476 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] New Mult for SS (score: 1): Author: "Richard F. DiDonna NN3W" <richnn3w@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2020 14:07:44 -0500; There are always challenging sections in Sweepstakes. IIRC, a couple years back in SS CW, I missed Santa Barbara and Nebraska. TIme to delete those sections? 73 Rich NN3W On 1/5/2020 12:04 PM, Jim B; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-01/msg00074.html (9,174 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] New Mult for SS (score: 1): Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>; Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2020 18:21:12 -0400; There are always challenging sections in Sweepstakes. IIRC, a couple years back in SS CW, I missed Santa Barbara and Nebraska. TIme to delete those sections? 73 Rich NN3W Rich and everyone. My previo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-01/msg00078.html (9,193 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] New Mult for SS (score: 1): Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 00:54:03 -0500; Hi Jim I find this comment interesting - please elaborate. I have a decent station on 160. Yes - I have worked you on 160, and I assume you were running QRP, perhaps not... BUT - why is it MY respons; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-01/msg00090.html (25,287 bytes)
13. Re: [CQ-Contest] New Mult for SS (score: 1): Author: "rjairam@gmail.com" <rjairam@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 10:53:02 -0500; While a conspiracy against the west coast might seem cute, the results dont bear that out. I can assure you that when discussing contest rules at the ARRL, we do not engineer the rules to disadvantag; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-01/msg00096.html (9,715 bytes)
14. Re: [CQ-Contest] New Mult for SS (score: 1): Author: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 11:20:14 -0500; I am on the East Coast and find that in many contests, among the most difficult to work are states nearby due to propagation. Stan, K4SBZ "Real radio bounces off the sky." ___________________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-01/msg00099.html (10,584 bytes)
15. Re: [CQ-Contest] New Mult for SS (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 11:03:24 -0800; On 1/6/2020 9:54 PM, Tom Haavisto wrote: BUT - why is it MY responsibility to build sufficient RX capabilities on my end to copy a QRP signal from W6 on 160? There are a number of stations in ONN who; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-01/msg00100.html (10,186 bytes)
16. Re: [CQ-Contest] New Mult for SS (score: 1): Author: robert wa1fcn <wa1fcn@charter.net>; Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 13:42:13 -0600; Maine is New England. New England is still advantages to everyone else. Unless your thinking it's Maine against Maine ? BoB WA1FCN I can assure you that when discuss; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-01/msg00102.html (10,819 bytes)
17. Re: [CQ-Contest] New Mult for SS (score: 1): Author: Edward Sawyer <EdwardS@sbelectronics.com>; Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 21:51:28 -0500; Sorry Jim. Its no one's responsibility to pull a small signal out of the mud. If you want to be heard, or anyone else wants to be heard, and having difficulty, improve your signal. On the otherhand,; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-01/msg00107.html (11,908 bytes)
18. Re: [CQ-Contest] New Mult for SS (score: 1): Author: Edward Sawyer <EdwardS@sbelectronics.com>; Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 21:55:45 -0500; New England is not advantaged in SS though. Hardly any top 10 finishes come out of W1. This is all about people needing to "feel the rush" of the clean sweep. A SS tradition. Has nothing to do with a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-01/msg00108.html (12,296 bytes)
19. Re: [CQ-Contest] New Mult for SS (score: 1): Author: Paul Young <k1xm@k1xm.org>; Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2020 09:04:39 -0500; Nonsense. You don't improve your station so Jim can get another multiplier (sorry, Jim). You do it because you want to win. If you can work W6 QRP stations you will have more QSOs than guys who can't; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-01/msg00113.html (9,863 bytes)
20. Re: [CQ-Contest] New Mult for SS (score: 1): Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>; Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2020 11:46:28 -0700; I've been a ham for over 50 years and I have NEVER considered it to be anyone else's responsibility to hear me. I'm curious where that remarkable impression comes from. Dave AB7E BUT - why is it M; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-01/msg00118.html (10,941 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]