Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+New\s+log\s+deadline\s+for\s+ARRL\s+contests\?\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] New log deadline for ARRL contests? (score: 1)
Author: Dave_Hoaglin@abtassoc.com (Dave_Hoaglin@abtassoc.com)
Date: Tue Jun 4 13:15:25 2002
At Saturday's meeting of the Yankee Clipper Contest Club, Dan N1ND made a lively and informative presentation on developments at the ARRL Contest Branch. Many of these have to do with contest coverag
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-06/msg00038.html (8,787 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] New log deadline for ARRL contests? (score: 1)
Author: wd4ahz@gte.net (Ron Wetjen)
Date: Wed Jun 5 04:24:44 2002
Bring it on! I usually send my logs in within a day or two anyway ... no big deal. 73, Ron
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-06/msg00044.html (7,947 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] New log deadline for ARRL contests? (score: 1)
Author: W2CS@bellsouth.net (Gary Ferdinand W2CS)
Date: Wed Jun 5 10:24:11 2002
This is an excellent idea. A week would not be too short, in my opinion, especially given Dan's flexibility for special occasions. 73/Gary W2CS
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-06/msg00050.html (10,209 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] New log deadline for ARRL contests? (score: 1)
Author: thompson@mindspring.com (David L. Thompson)
Date: Wed Jun 5 11:38:53 2002
I think what Dan is seeing is that most e-mail logs arrive within a day or two of the end of a contest. IF all contest entries were e-mail logs then there would be no problem. However, since ARRL mus
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-06/msg00051.html (9,688 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] New log deadline for ARRL contests? (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com (Jimk8mr@aol.com)
Date: Wed Jun 5 13:55:09 2002
I find that if I submit a log 29 days after the contest, it is probably because I have forgotten about it since about day 3. It would be nice to have some automated service for which one could sign u
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-06/msg00053.html (10,076 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] New log deadline for ARRL contests? (score: 1)
Author: 00tlzivney@bsu.edu (Zivney, Terry L.)
Date: Wed Jun 5 13:44:03 2002
I don't think one should expect to receive an exception. Exception means rare, and is subject to discretion, which could change in the future. Furthermore, there are legitimate reasons for longer per
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-06/msg00054.html (12,056 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] New log deadline for ARRL contests? (score: 1)
Author: jjreisert@alum.mit.edu (Jim Reisert)
Date: Wed Jun 5 11:56:15 2002
OK, so they're going to cut the deadline in half, from 30 days to 15 days. Does this mean the RESULTS will be computed and printed twice as fast? I doubt it. 73 - Jim AD1C == Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Char
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-06/msg00055.html (8,652 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] New log deadline for ARRL contests? (score: 1)
Author: n2mg@eham.net (Michael Gilmer)
Date: Wed Jun 5 19:10:12 2002
I'm sure all the anti-log-sanitizing nazis will be happy, but the programmers might not be. Now they have but a few days to fix any Cabrillo-generation bugs that might not be discovered until late. (
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-06/msg00062.html (10,645 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] New log deadline for ARRL contests? (score: 1)
Author: kk9a@arrl.net (kk9a@arrl.net)
Date: Wed Jun 5 20:54:15 2002
I've operated a number of contests from various Caribbean locations. I usually center the contest around a vacation so it may be a week or two before I arrive back home. Once home there's usually a l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-06/msg00066.html (8,624 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] New log deadline for ARRL contests? (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Wed Jun 5 22:19:58 2002
Because, as someone else commented, November is loaded with contests, and there are a few other things going on. More to the point, what possible anti-cheating benefit is derived from cutting the dea
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-06/msg00067.html (9,734 bytes)

11. [CQ-Contest] New log deadline for ARRL contests? (score: 1)
Author: swca@swbell.net (Mark Beckwith)
Date: Wed Jun 5 22:32:30 2002
I think there is too much time at present between the event and the results. Reducing the time frame for log submission could contribute directly to shortening this time. I think it's a good idea. M
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-06/msg00068.html (8,886 bytes)

12. [CQ-Contest] New log deadline for ARRL contests? (score: 1)
Author: swca@swbell.net (Mark Beckwith)
Date: Wed Jun 5 22:36:11 2002
up, send What an absolutely great idea. The miracles of modern technology could be put to good use. Mark, N5OT That explains your bald spot... 73, Ward N0AX hour or so, it *did* keep my Bose phones
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-06/msg00069.html (10,435 bytes)

13. [CQ-Contest] New log deadline for ARRL contests? (score: 1)
Author: swca@swbell.net (Mark Beckwith)
Date: Wed Jun 5 23:00:18 2002
KB3MM asks: The reason I rarely do that is because preparing the log is a tedious and time consuming process which is about the last thing I would want to do right after opeating a (long) contest. I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-06/msg00070.html (9,606 bytes)

14. [CQ-Contest] New log deadline for ARRL contests? (score: 1)
Author: ludal@dmv.com (Dallas Carter)
Date: Thu Jun 6 01:28:45 2002
Lots of comments on this, but most are using tunnel vision. IMHO there is more to consider than a single op with a 1000 QSO computerized log. Why not send your comments to Dan and let him weigh your
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-06/msg00072.html (8,498 bytes)

15. Fw: [CQ-Contest] New log deadline for ARRL contests? (score: 1)
Author: k7qq@netzero.net (Rex Maner)
Date: Thu Jun 6 02:53:27 2002
GOSH Don't You know its gotta be cleaned up before submission ? Quack logs 15 the information, your might
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-06/msg00074.html (10,923 bytes)

16. [CQ-Contest] New log deadline for ARRL contests? (score: 1)
Author: swca@swbell.net (Mark Beckwith)
Date: Thu Jun 6 15:45:05 2002
KB3MM asked me: Here are a few examples: Let's say I switched bands on the radio but forgot to switch bands on the program. I think I owe it to everyone to go through and do all the ensuing damage co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-06/msg00077.html (10,122 bytes)

17. [CQ-Contest] New log deadline for ARRL contests? (score: 1)
Author: n4gi@tampabay.rr.com (Blake M. Meinecke)
Date: Thu Jun 6 20:04:14 2002
ensuing This one might be legitimate, but why wait till afterward?? I do it when it's still fresh in my head (after a break, or between the next band change). ..... Or just look up the correct spelli
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-06/msg00083.html (13,303 bytes)

18. [CQ-Contest] New log deadline for ARRL contests? (score: 1)
Author: kr1g@hotmail.com (ted demopoulos)
Date: Fri Jun 7 03:56:26 2002
Not for me. I fix calls like G444XYZ (sticky key probably) and ##DF2ABC (clearly a typo). Obvious stuff I got wrong, and 95% of the time I KNOW it's wrong ahead of time, but didn;t have the time or
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-06/msg00085.html (11,846 bytes)

19. [CQ-Contest] New log deadline for ARRL contests? (score: 1)
Author: k5zd@charter.net (Randy Thompson, K5ZD)
Date: Fri Jun 7 04:42:18 2002
I don't think log submission is the gating item in the log checking or results generation process! If you are going to allow exceptions, why bother to shorten the deadline. I would attack the problem
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-06/msg00086.html (10,138 bytes)

20. [CQ-Contest] New log deadline for ARRL contests? (score: 1)
Author: wk6i@twistedoak.com (Jeff Stai WK6I)
Date: Thu Jun 6 21:42:51 2002
I keep a paper notepad next to my operating position to keep track of things like this to go back and fix later. Better to do it later in calm moment than in the heat of battle... I'd rather go back
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-06/msg00087.html (11,069 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu