- 1. [CQ-Contest] Off Time (score: 1)
- Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
- Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:22:57 -0800
- And the beauty of the new process is that it is indeed consistent for all of the players. If you have QSOs that occur at 0000 and 0001 in your log, have you been on the air one minute of two? If you
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00258.html (8,174 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Off Time (score: 1)
- Author: "Ken Widelitz" <widelitz@gte.net>
- Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 15:27:26 -0800
- In the 0000 and 0030 example, since there is only 29 minutes of off time - it shouldn't count as an off time at all, since off times require a minimum of 30 minutes. And what about the last few minut
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00265.html (7,669 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Off Time (score: 1)
- Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
- Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 01:36:07 +0000
- N6TR replied to K6LL: <snip> <snip> Okay, now I'm confused. What's "new"? I thought that was how off time was always calculated. ;^) 73, VR2BrettGraham _______________________________________________
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00278.html (7,672 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Off Time (score: 1)
- Author: "Tyler Stewart" <k3mm@comcast.net>
- Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 22:07:43 -0500
- I've always wondered why it apparently wasnt done that way before. Exactly right, Tree! Bravo! Ty K3MM _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.co
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00284.html (9,319 bytes)
- 5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Off Time (score: 1)
- Author: "Milt Jensen" <n5ia@zia-connection.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 11:21:46 -0700
- I don't subscribe to this. It is not the 0001 minute until the 0000 minute is complete. Until then it is the 0000 minute. If you make a contact in the 0000 minute and do not make another until the 0
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00312.html (8,077 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu