Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Packet\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Packet (score: 1)
Author: g4buo@compuserve.com (Dave Lawley)
Date: Sun Jun 1 06:04:13 2003
I disagree that it was successful. A lot of us stopped entering the WAE contest when DARC took this step. Packet assistance is fundamentally different from single operator. You're benefitting from hu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00002.html (7,760 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] packet (score: 1)
Author: hrle@ipazin.net (Hrvoje Horvat)
Date: Mon Jun 2 01:20:38 2003
You should remember the time when they said The Beatles will ruin the world?! Is it that the cluster will ruin the contesting?! Quttin' a contest for not being your way?! Are you really a contester?!
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00008.html (7,316 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] Packet (score: 1)
Author: n6nt@arrl.net (Bruce Sawyer)
Date: Mon Jun 2 16:59:46 2003
I agree completely with Dave's comments (though not with his spelling :-) ). The Russian DX Contest is another event which allows unlimited use of packet, and after my less-than-happy experience with
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00019.html (8,645 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] Packet (score: 1)
Author: jpryor@uga.edu (Jay Pryor)
Date: Mon Jun 2 15:31:49 2003
I want to echo K9GY's sentiments that those of you who are skipping the WAE simply because they allow the use of packet are missing a great way to spend a couple of summer weekends. You might be surp
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00023.html (9,466 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] Packet (score: 1)
Author: w9sz@prairienet.org (Zack Widup)
Date: Mon Jun 2 16:27:12 2003
That's a good point. Some of us contest to try to win, some of us just enjoy working stations in a contest environment. Some people do both. I fit mostly into the second category. I just have fun wor
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00026.html (10,423 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] Packet (score: 1)
Author: corneliuspaul@gmx.net (corneliuspaul@gmx.net)
Date: Tue Jun 3 02:41:33 2003
in other words. it is much less rewarding (to me). please keep the non assisted category among the assisted one. i dont care much for the foul players on either side. 73 con df4sa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00031.html (8,551 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] Packet (score: 1)
Author: tree@kkn.net (Tree)
Date: Mon Jun 2 20:15:28 2003
Totally agree and I experienced one of the first WAE contests when packet was allowed in the same category as single-op. I operated from France and my score was totally demolished by German stations
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00033.html (8,579 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] Packet (score: 1)
Author: gissel@fh-ludwigshafen.de (Prof. Dr. Andreas Gissel)
Date: Tue Jun 3 11:48:12 2003
--Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-- Von: Prof. Dr. Andreas Gissel [mailto:DL3YBM@t-online.de] Gesendet: Dienstag, 3. Juni 2003 10:16 An: Prof. Dr. Andreas Gissel Betreff: Fw: [CQ-Contest] Packet ** snip, sni
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00042.html (11,524 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] PACKET (score: 1)
Author: N7MAL@CITLINK.NET (N7MAL)
Date: Fri Jun 13 04:16:12 2003
I knew if I waited long enough before jumping back in someone, somewhere, would make a defining statement and Good Ole Tom W7WHY did. """If you are using packet, you have ~1000 people doing the hunti
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00167.html (10,514 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] PACKET (score: 1)
Author: n4gi@tampabay.rr.com (n4gi@tampabay.rr.com)
Date: Fri Jun 13 13:04:05 2003
<<<There is no skill involved in watching a packet screen to tell you what frequency to go to and find a contact.>>> There has to be some skill required, because 90% of the spots during contests are
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00172.html (8,524 bytes)

11. [CQ-Contest] PACKET (score: 1)
Author: k1ttt@arrl.net (David Robbins K1TTT)
Date: Fri Jun 13 18:26:34 2003
your achieved You have obviously not used dx spotting with the current world wide network in a serious multi-op situation. Speak of that which you know, not what you imagine! David Robbins K1TTT e-m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00174.html (8,179 bytes)

12. [CQ-Contest] PACKET (score: 1)
Author: nat@ajheatwole.com (Nat Heatwole)
Date: Fri Jun 13 23:01:54 2003
find a reading radio. You ARE NOT Funny, as I understand it, packet can't *WORK* people for you. Call me old-fashioned, but working people efficiently still requires skill. In fact, it takes a lot of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00179.html (8,406 bytes)

13. [CQ-Contest] PACKET (score: 1)
Author: k1ttt@arrl.net (David Robbins K1TTT)
Date: Sat Jun 14 11:33:11 2003
world operated just a lucky guess??? No, it is obvious from your statements that you know not what you are speaking of. wide A lucky guess??? I guess not! makes contact how the As I said, you don't
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00181.html (9,811 bytes)

14. [CQ-Contest] PACKET (score: 1)
Author: k4sb@earthlink.net (K4SB)
Date: Sat Jun 14 16:16:49 2003
Fellows, with all due respect to both sides of this discussion, I am getting sick and tired of reading about it! No one is going to change their mind, or anything else. If you must keep this up, woul
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00183.html (7,982 bytes)

15. [CQ-Contest] Packet (score: 1)
Author: ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca (Kelly Taylor)
Date: Sat Jun 14 16:25:10 2003
Hear the one about the communist who won an economic-system argument with the capitalist? Or vice-versa? Of course not. Nobody ever WINS those arguments, except in the eyes of the like-minded. The be
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00184.html (10,573 bytes)

16. [CQ-Contest] PACKET (score: 1)
Author: N7MAL@CITLINK.NET (N7MAL)
Date: Sun Jun 15 13:15:46 2003
I had actually considered publicly backing off the idiot/moron/loser remarks but no more, thanks to James, WW3S and others. My email inbox has be overwhelmed, like N6TJ's, with folks who seem to have
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00189.html (12,665 bytes)

17. [CQ-Contest] PACKET (score: 1)
Author: Alan Zack <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 20:28:50 -0800
Speaking of PACKET I sure wish people would not post who they DON'T hear! Right now there is a reported operation on KP5 for the next 48 hrs or so. One station has spotted hearing them and now there
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00291.html (6,894 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu