Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Plaque\s+for\s+Multi\s+\-\s+Single\s+LOW\s+POWER\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Plaque\s+for\s+Multi\s+\-\s+Single\s+LOW\s+POWER\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Plaque for Multi - Single LOW POWER (score: 1): Author: wally@el-soft.com (Valeri Stefanov); Date: Thu Mar 9 12:32:22 2000; Hello , =20 I am currently considering to sponsor a plaque for the category which at present is not included either in CQWW or CQWPX contests - Multi-Single LOW POWER.( of course if any of contest ma; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-03/msg00107.html (8,943 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Plaque for Multi - Single LOW POWER (score: 1): Author: w.dillon@ic.ac.uk (Dillon, W); Date: Thu Mar 9 14:38:50 2000; Hello Wally, What a generous gesture, I guess that's what Ham Radio is all about! Good call Wally, encourage more 'average' (if you'll forgive that term) amateur ops. to have a go. A plaque for eithe; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-03/msg00109.html (10,913 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Plaque for Multi - Single LOW POWER (score: 1): Author: n4vhk@summitschool.com (Henry Heidtmann); Date: Thu Mar 9 14:00:07 2000; Wally, Thanks for your post. This is a topic which, from time to time, has been tossed about then promptly disposed of. I think it is a good ideaMany groups would like to participate in the bigger co; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-03/msg00111.html (11,134 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] Plaque for Multi - Single LOW POWER (score: 1): Author: barry@MXG.com (Barry Merrill); Date: Fri Mar 10 15:12:41 2000; I'm not against a low power Multi-Single category, but I don't think that's going to increase the number of stations to talk to, and that's what the Run stations need - new blood to talk to. We need; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-03/msg00132.html (9,209 bytes)
5. Fw: [CQ-Contest] Plaque for Multi - Single LOW POWER (score: 1): Author: wally@el-soft.com (Valeri Stefanov); Date: Fri Mar 10 23:13:01 2000; Hi Barry, Thanks a lot for the input. Although I always respect others' opinion and this was the reason for my posting on the reflector I think the message of Henry - N4VHK reflects fully what I have; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-03/msg00135.html (10,158 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] Plaque for Multi - Single LOW POWER (score: 1): Author: n5nw@midsouth.rr.com (Marty Watt); Date: Fri Mar 10 18:46:41 2000; Would we be better off changing the requirements for a rookie class? Right now, the contests that have a "rookie" class are based on the length of time one has held a license. If I've been licensed f; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-03/msg00136.html (9,669 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] Plaque for Multi - Single LOW POWER (score: 1): Author: wigi@alaska.com (Wigi Tozzi); Date: Sat Mar 11 02:33:33 2000; On the surface, I really like the idea of a M/S low power plaque. My fear would be that like anything competitive, this plaque would soon be out of reach of almost everyone. A W4, or LZ, or JA, or KL; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-03/msg00139.html (9,087 bytes)
8. [CQ-Contest] Plaque for Multi - Single LOW POWER (score: 1): Author: ludal@dmv.com (Dallas Carter); Date: Sat Mar 11 08:26:10 2000; Have not read the proposal, but the boys down under have complained for years that they can not compete with others in the region as they are power limited. If your proposal addresses their plight, t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-03/msg00144.html (8,143 bytes)
9. [CQ-Contest] Plaque for Multi - Single LOW POWER (score: 1): Author: k1ttt@berkshire.net (David Robbins); Date: Sat Mar 11 17:14:44 2000; look at the cqww rtty test for a multi op low power catagory, i think its a very interesting catagory and has lots of advantages. its main advantage is that you can get a couple ops together at ANY s; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-03/msg00146.html (8,716 bytes)
10. [CQ-Contest] Plaque for Multi - Single LOW POWER (score: 1): Author: wally@el-soft.com (Valeri Stefanov); Date: Sat Mar 11 17:20:02 2000; Hi Wigi, I must agree with you on the chance this plaque to be won by EA9,PJ4 etc. most of the time. At the same time you have not made any other suggestion. Do you have a better idea how to encourag; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-03/msg00147.html (8,847 bytes)
11. [CQ-Contest] Plaque for Multi - Single LOW POWER (score: 1): Author: wally@el-soft.com (Valeri Stefanov); Date: Sat Mar 11 17:20:02 2000; Hi Wigi, I must agree with you on the chance this plaque to be won by EA9,PJ4 etc. most of the time. At the same time you have not made any other suggestion. Do you have a better idea how to encourag; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-03/msg00148.html (8,822 bytes)
12. [CQ-Contest] Plaque for Multi - Single LOW POWER (score: 1): Author: jay@ieway.com (Jay Townsend); Date: Sat Mar 11 23:00:43 2000; I suggest you award plaques to U.S, NA, EU, SA, etc. just like they do for the CQWW RTTY contests. Of course you would need a few more sponsers. -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-co; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-03/msg00155.html (8,150 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]