Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Public\s+Logs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Public\s+Logs\s*$/: 106 ]

Total 106 documents matching your query.

61. [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: "Mike Baker" <mbaker@chisox.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 19:41:42 -0600; << I think you answered your own question, Art. Think of it as playing poker with all your cards face up on the table. You be the judge whether that would change anything. Despite other comments, all; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00516.html (9,051 bytes)
62. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: "David Kopacz" <david.kopacz@aspwebhosting.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 16:58:53 -0600; "I have yet to see any evidence that public logs compromise or reveal any "secret" techniques / methods or divulges anything anyone should want to protect." I beg to differ with you Bob. If you think; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00517.html (9,079 bytes)
63. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: "David Kopacz" <david.kopacz@aspwebhosting.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 17:11:29 -0600; "If you send in a log, and claim a score, is it rocket science that how you got that score would be open to public scrutiny? Maybe those who do not want there logs to be public should also encrypt th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00518.html (10,210 bytes)
64. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: "Barry Merrill" <barry@mxg.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 06:02:38 -0600; By not submitting your log, you prevent complete adjucation. If you submit, and I logged you as K0SB, I loose points properly. If you don't submit, I get points I don't deserve. 73 Barry, EI/W5GN ___; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00520.html (8,949 bytes)
65. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: "Jim Reisert AD1C" <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 23:55:13 -0700; I think this is a poor analogy. The analogy only works if you are allowed to see all the cards, but ONLY AFTER all the hands have been played (i.e. after the contest is over). Unless a station monito; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00521.html (9,134 bytes)
66. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: "Robert Naumann" <w5ov@w5ov.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 23:36:54 -0600; Dave, Aside from seeing what time they were working stuff that you weren't, I still remain skeptical that you have been able to leverage their experience in any way from looking at their old log. I'm; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00522.html (10,170 bytes)
67. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: Dallas W3PP <w3pp.dallas@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 07:29:44 -0500; All interesting points to be sure. Everyone has their own opinion of what may or may not be revealed. The one point that I have not seen profered is, if the logs have been adjudicated by the contest; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00523.html (9,036 bytes)
68. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com; Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 09:16:56 EST; The one point that I have not seen proffered is, if the logs have been adjudicated by the contest committee, why would you want/need to see them. In other words, what's in it for you to see my logs?; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00524.html (9,070 bytes)
69. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: "VE5ZX" <ve5zx@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 07:43:42 -0600; Public logs allows others to develop new adjudication tools that the committee does not have. For an example see the article "Two Radio Event Signatures" at http://www.radiosport.ca/rsrp/documents/2; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00525.html (9,658 bytes)
70. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>; Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 08:17:42 -0800; This is even more important in contests that also check exchanges such as Sweepstakes and WPX! Every log received makes the log checking more complete. Merry Christmas to all. Randy, K5ZD ___________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00526.html (9,833 bytes)
71. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: "Sandy Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>; Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 09:47:48 -0600; My two cents: While I wouldn't like to see all contests make logs public, any more than I would want to see all contests adopt SS-like exchanges or all contests adopt QTCs or QSY rules or any of the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00531.html (11,572 bytes)
72. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 05:32:42 -0800; Barry, you are absolutely right. The higher the incidence of log submissions, even thin logs like mine, the more complete a picture the sponsor has of the participation and the more accurately he can; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00535.html (10,638 bytes)
73. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: <w1md@cfl.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 23:52:41 -0500; Well... CW Skimmer will effectively nullify that 'concern'...for CW contests anyway. If you are in the carib and can hear other carib stations...setup CW Skimmer and you can monitor the competition (; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00537.html (12,057 bytes)
74. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: Mike Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>; Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 11:36:37 -0500; As opposed to the philosophical discussion of the public/secret log issue, just how are these public logs to be accessed? Does the sponsor have to put them on line and allow downloading to all? And f; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00545.html (10,072 bytes)
75. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 09:02:40 -0500; We've been debating this topic on and off for at least 15 years, and yet one question remains unanswered: Why do YOU want to look at MY log? It's one thing for the log to be turned in as part of the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00547.html (11,378 bytes)
76. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com; Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 17:13:23 EST; Being in the middle of log checking, I cannot at all believe that a casually interested person could get past one or two logs without finding something more interesting to do, like trim their fingern; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00551.html (10,029 bytes)
77. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: "Robert Naumann" <w5ov@w5ov.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 15:51:02 -0600; "We've been debating this topic on and off for at least 15 years and yet one question remains unanswered: Why do YOU want to look at MY log"? There are myriad reasons why one would want to look at an; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00552.html (9,815 bytes)
78. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 17:21:43 -0500; A private email I just received, said, in part: "I think that making logs public is a terrific deterrent against cheating... We already have a instances where highly questionable behavior has been di; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00555.html (11,022 bytes)
79. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: "David Kopacz" <david.kopacz@aspwebhosting.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 22:11:22 -0600; The questions that truly remain unanswered are: Why does one care if his or her log is made public? What is there in one's log that one would want to hide? What is one afraid of? Why would one choose; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00558.html (11,006 bytes)
80. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1): Author: <w1md@cfl.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 05:37:14 -0800; Fallacious arguments. We don't put our finances in public display...period. No comparison to operating in a VERY PUBLIC event. This is getting TEDIOUS and old...15 years old. Time to shut this thread; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00562.html (12,399 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]