Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Putting\s+the\s+spoon\s+into\s+the\s+pot\:\s+WPX\s+\-\s+who\s+is\s+on\s+first\?\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Putting the spoon into the pot: WPX - who is on first? (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:36:58 +0000 (GMT)
Just got my March 2009 CQ mag with the cw WPX results. YIPPIE!! I won a trophy!! BUT WAIT A MINUTE.....what's this I see? TI5N wins for the world (congrats) and get the WORLD trophy. I win for USA, b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00455.html (8,372 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Putting the spoon into the pot: WPX - who is on first? (score: 1)
Author: "Yuri VE3DZ" <ve3dz@rigexpert.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 22:06:44 -0500
That's the way ARRL handles it (and I like it). If you won 2 trophies - you should get 2 trophies. 73 Yuri _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesti
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00458.html (7,980 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Putting the spoon into the pot: WPX - who is on first? (score: 1)
Author: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>
Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 10:05:19 -0800
This is not an issue specific to the WPX Contest. I believe all CQ Contests (WW, RTTY, WPX, 160) follow this convention of only awarding one plaque per entry. The goal of the plaque program is to mot
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00001.html (11,083 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Putting the spoon into the pot: WPX - who is on first? (score: 1)
Author: Jim George <n3bb@mindspring.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 13:43:15 -0600
KR2Q is right on target. I understand the overall philosophy of not concentrating the "wealth" and encouraging more activity through broader recognition. More recognition plaques are good. But it see
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00010.html (13,903 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Putting the spoon into the pot: WPX - who is on first? (score: 1)
Author: Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 05:23:21 -0800 (PST)
I agree with Jim on this approach. It's a tough decision, having dealt with it on a smaller level with the Tennessee QSO Party (shameless plug). My opinion is that it is difficult to compare radiospo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00025.html (18,309 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Putting the spoon into the pot: WPX - who is on first? (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 13:42:19 +0000 (GMT)
[snip] When I was TDS Rallying, there were trophies for the top three places in most categories. Maybe it's time to consider something like this for major contests? [end snip] This is a GREAT idea. I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00028.html (8,777 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Putting the spoon into the pot: WPX - who is on first? (score: 1)
Author: Prasad <vu2ptt@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 20:41:59 +0530
<snip> I know lots of folks who feel "who am I to sponsor a trophy for the winner...I'm just Joe Ham?" Or more likely, "All the awards are already sponsored" (far from the truth). </snip> How about s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00036.html (10,222 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu