Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Q\s+or\s+not\s+to\s+Q\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Q or not to Q (score: 1)
Author: otterstad@enter.vg (Ragnar Otterstad)
Date: Fri Mar 22 09:53:38 2002
Q-code should never be a part of the callsign. 73 LA5HE/QRO Hi 73 de Rag LA5HE also JW5HE OZ8RO located in Telemark - home of skiing. My " antenna farm" can be found on : http://no.photos.yahoo.com/l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00379.html (8,553 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] Q or not to Q (score: 1)
Author: N5RP@pdq.net (Bob, N5RP)
Date: Fri Mar 22 12:36:22 2002
==> Hmm, Never thought of it from that angle. I see your point. Bob Perring ........................................... Amateur Radio Station N5RP mailto:N5RP@pdq.net N5RP Station Page: http://freewe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00384.html (7,659 bytes)

3. Fw: [CQ-Contest] Q or not to Q (score: 1)
Author: k7qq@netzero.net (Rex Maner)
Date: Sat Mar 23 04:26:22 2002
Quack's I agree with the statememt that /QRP is just a waste of time. Look at the nr of dits and dahs. That is equal to a 1x2 or 2x1 call. the /qrp usually follows a 2/3 call sign. This really drags
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00399.html (7,638 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu