Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+QST\s+vs\.\s+NCJ\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+QST\s+vs\.\s+NCJ\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] QST vs. NCJ (score: 1): Author: lee@dixieliner.com (Lee Hiers); Date: Fri Jan 11 09:53:40 2002; You guys may not have seen this mentioned on the contest reflector, or may not have given it serious consideration, but I think you should. Should contest coverage be effectively removed from QST, as; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00200.html (7,830 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] QST vs. NCJ (score: 1): Author: W3DMB@aol.com (W3DMB@aol.com); Date: Fri Jan 11 16:57:44 2002; Actually, I don't think it would save them much money... They sell advertising space based on how many magazines they sell and how many people will see the ads. If they were to lose a lot of readers; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00218.html (9,815 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] QST vs. NCJ (score: 1): Author: lee@dixieliner.com (Lee Hiers); Date: Fri Jan 11 17:38:09 2002; True enough...which means if the content the $ spenders are interested in leaves QST, smart companies won't be spending their advertising dollars there on ads for high-end rigs...and you end up with; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00219.html (8,708 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] QST vs. NCJ (score: 1): Author: aa7bg@3rivers.net (Matt & Carrie Trott); Date: Sat Jan 12 01:21:11 2002; Great idea. I'll take a lifetime sub to NCJ. Matt--K7BG --Original Message-- From: owner-cq-contest@contesting.com [mailto:owner-cq-contest@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Lee Hiers Sent: Friday, January; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00232.html (8,977 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] QST vs. NCJ (score: 1): Author: kg5u@hal-pc.org (Dale L Martin); Date: Sat Jan 12 02:00:08 2002; I wouldn't be too quick to put down the 'shack on a belt' group. They may very well be what keeps the manufacturers interested enough in producing radios for the ham market to even produce HF radios; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00233.html (9,561 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] QST vs. NCJ (score: 1): Author: ford@cmgate.com (Ford Peterson); Date: Sat Jan 12 13:16:55 2002; Matt, This option of NCJ vs QST has been discussed from time-to-time by the BoD but makes no sense for the following reasons: 1) advertising $$$ for the ARRL is driven by the number of copies of QST; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00251.html (11,099 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] QST vs. NCJ (score: 1): Author: lee@dixieliner.com (Lee Hiers); Date: Sat Jan 12 15:04:50 2002; Why? If the ARRL doesn't think there are enough contesters (and potential new contesters) to justify leaving relatively full contest reporting in QST, there shouldn't be that many who would "jump shi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00253.html (8,873 bytes)
8. [CQ-Contest] QST vs. NCJ (score: 1): Author: kc5ajx@hotmail.com (Rick Bullon); Date: Sat Jan 12 20:36:49 2002; Hummmm I seem to remeber that I pay a subscription for NCJ each year. Why is the cost comming out of the general funds?????? 73 Rick KC5AJX __________________________________________________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00255.html (9,620 bytes)
9. [CQ-Contest] QST vs. NCJ (score: 1): Author: gm3poi@btinternet.com (Clive GM3POI); Date: Sat Jan 12 22:14:36 2002; If CQ Magazine get there act together they could effectively poach the 3 main ARRL contests with a promise to publish the result in CQ. But are they shrewd enough to see an opportunity. As far as ove; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00256.html (8,456 bytes)
10. [CQ-Contest] QST vs. NCJ (score: 1): Author: k8gt@flash.net (Gerry Treas); Date: Sun Jan 13 01:38:10 2002; Since when does a subscription entirely pay for a magazine? Or your local newspaper for that matter? 73, Gerry K8GT each year. Why is -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Ad; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00261.html (7,736 bytes)
11. [CQ-Contest] QST vs. NCJ (score: 1): Author: rjohnson@tmlp.com (Bob Johnson); Date: Sat Jan 12 20:05:12 2002; Hi: Being a Life Member of the NRA since 1963 I can only say that one of the worst things the NRA did was to fractionate the membership into "Us and Them" when they came out with "The American Riflem; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00263.html (10,707 bytes)
12. [CQ-Contest] QST vs. NCJ (score: 1): Author: w9sz@prairienet.org (Zack Widup); Date: Sat Jan 12 23:32:36 2002; Reiman Publications in Greendale, Wisconsin (http://www.reimanpub.com) has managed to put together 10 magazines which are completely paid for by subscription fees. (Alas, none are ham radio magazines; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00270.html (8,010 bytes)
13. [CQ-Contest] QST vs. NCJ (score: 1): Author: rjohnson@tmlp.com (Bob Johnson); Date: Mon Jan 14 11:21:37 2002; Actually it is 3 rags, don't forget QEX/CQ Communication Quarterly !!! I think the League could stand to dump both publications, recoup the publishing costs, and gain advertising $$$ by increasing QS; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00330.html (13,471 bytes)
14. [CQ-Contest] QST vs. NCJ (score: 1): Author: ve6yp@shaw.ca (tony field); Date: Mon Jan 14 23:57:50 2002; Some of QEX and NCJ needs to be put back into QST. The problem with QST is not the contest coverage but the editorial quality. A better put together magazine with much more interesting articles by a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00341.html (9,393 bytes)
15. [CQ-Contest] QST vs. NCJ (score: 1): Author: frenaye@pcnet.com (Tom Frenaye); Date: Sun Jan 27 21:14:53 2002; Actually, ham radio has divided into lots of interest groups over the past 20 years, and instead of standing together we often fight among each other. Take a look through the QST Section News column; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00592.html (10,172 bytes)
16. [CQ-Contest] QST vs. NCJ (score: 1): Author: W2CS@bellsouth.net (Gary J. Ferdinand); Date: Mon Jan 28 09:45:03 2002; I think the sugggestion of eliminating QEX/NCJ and putting them into QST deserves a bit more thought. Certainly there are fixed costs involved with having multiple magz that would be eliminated entir; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00600.html (12,681 bytes)
17. [CQ-Contest] QST vs. NCJ (score: 1): Author: frenaye@pcnet.com (Tom Frenaye); Date: Tue Jan 29 09:42:29 2002; Hi Gary - The paper the NCJ is printed on is actually better paper -- and more expensive -- than QST paper. It's just not coated. As for other costs of printing, I know K1RO and other in Newington ar; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00640.html (9,612 bytes)
18. [CQ-Contest] QST vs. NCJ (score: 1): Author: "Warren C. Stankiewicz" <nf1j@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 09:06:22 -0700; Once again, the suggestion has surfaced that ARRL membership move to a boutique model, perhaps something more analagous to IEEE membership. Which is a nice idea in theory, but a hard one to put into; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00331.html (9,819 bytes)
19. Re: [CQ-Contest] QST vs. NCJ (score: 1): Author: steve.root@culligan4water.com; Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 22:10:23 +0000; I've heard the argument that the ARRL feels there is important information that they have to get out to the members, and they have to do that through QST. Therefore getting NCJ instead of QST isn't a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00335.html (9,455 bytes)
20. Re: [CQ-Contest] QST vs. NCJ (score: 1): Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>; Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 19:52:37 -0400; Hmmm, should I feel slighted that the Section news isn't in QST any more? I liked reading that part of QST. Now we're expected to get this info on the web. Should I feel slighted that National Traffi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00337.html (9,098 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]