Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+RBN\s+Spots\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+RBN\s+Spots\?\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] RBN Spots? (score: 1): Author: Dave Edmonds <dave@pkministrywebs.com>; Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 16:33:28 +0000; I'll be playing in the WPX probably SOSB40. What CQ format do i need to use to be picked-up/spotted by RBN? Ty Dave WN4AFP _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-C; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-05/msg00259.html (6,541 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] RBN Spots? (score: 1): Author: "Bill Hider" <n3rr@erols.com>; Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 15:30:04 -0400; CQ CQ TEST de WN4AFP WN4AFP K will work just fine. Also, TEST de WN4AFP WN4AFP K will work, too. OR CQ CQ de WN4AFP WN4AFP K is good too. GL & 73, de Bill N3RR I'll be playing in the WPX probably SOS; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-05/msg00261.html (8,140 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] RBN Spots? (score: 1): Author: Matthew Stevens <matthew@mrstevens.net>; Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 15:49:28 -0400; Just CQCQCQ (or test test) then your callsign two or three times. - Matthew KK4FEM Sent from my iPhone _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.co; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-05/msg00263.html (7,599 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] RBN Spots? (score: 1): Author: <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 21:22:05 -0400; Sending "de" is unnecessary. John KK9A CQ CQ TEST de WN4AFP WN4AFP K will work just fine. Also, TEST de WN4AFP WN4AFP K will work, too. OR CQ CQ de WN4AFP WN4AFP K is good too. GL & 73, de Bill N3RR; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-05/msg00265.html (7,364 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] RBN Spots? (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 29 May 2016 09:27:31 -0400; So long as you have at least two repetitionsof the CQ key-words (CQ, TEST, FD, UP1 at least) and two repetitions of your call, you'll be heard and spotted, with the proviso that if you stay on the sa; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-05/msg00266.html (9,624 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] RBN Spots? (score: 1): Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 29 May 2016 17:03:11 -0500; (Serious question follows) Is there any "secret prosign" to inhibit the RBN from harvesting your call? 73, de Hans, K0HB So long as you have at least two repetitionsof the CQ key-words (CQ, TEST, FD,; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-05/msg00267.html (10,576 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] RBN Spots? (score: 1): Author: George Dubovsky <n4ua.va@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 29 May 2016 17:35:51 -0400; Sure, Hans. Just preface your call with P5/ and the system will ignore it... ;-) Completely unserious conjecture from: geo - n4ua _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing li; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-05/msg00268.html (11,635 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] RBN Spots? (score: 1): Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>; Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 08:27:03 -0300; Do I really need 2 repetitions? I use CQ VE9AA TEST (and never, ever CQ VE9AA VE9AA TEST) and seem to get spotted. I likely don't get spotted as much as other locals, but is this why, or is it just b; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-05/msg00270.html (8,095 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] RBN Spots? (score: 1): Author: "Eric Gruff" <egruff@cox.net>; Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 10:18:33 -0700; This is hugely helpful. I've been contesting a long time, and never paid much attention to being spotted (I just assumed it happened when someone liked your call or took pity on you). This past weeke; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-05/msg00271.html (8,531 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] RBN Spots? (score: 1): Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>; Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 12:59:56 -0700; It seems to me that the more efficient practice in general would be to use shorter calls sent more often, and it kind of saddens me to hear that the RBN might encourage longer calls sent less often.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-05/msg00272.html (10,225 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] RBN Spots? (score: 1): Author: <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 16:34:44 -0400; Are you sure that it's necessary to send your call twice? I have never sent a CQ this way and do not recall the skimmers avoiding me. John KK9A So long as you have at least two repetitionsof the CQ k; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-05/msg00273.html (8,915 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] RBN Spots? (score: 1): Author: George Dubovsky <n4ua.va@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 16:43:08 -0400; Eric, 73, geo - n4ua _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-05/msg00274.html (10,296 bytes)
13. Re: [CQ-Contest] RBN Spots? (score: 1): Author: donovanf@starpower.net; Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 17:33:32 -0400 (EDT); Hi Eric, Something is wrong with your analysis. You were spotted one hundred times during just the last 30 minutes of the contest http://www.reversebeacon.net/dxsd1/dxsd1.php?f=0&c=nc6k&t=dx How did; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-05/msg00275.html (9,845 bytes)
14. Re: [CQ-Contest] RBN Spots? (score: 1): Author: Alan Dewey via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 18:18:59 -0400; Pete; I want to make sure I understand this correctly (seriously). My practice is call CQ as follows: CQ TEST K0AD My QRZ is simply: TU K0AD Am I likely to still be stopped by the RBN? I would like t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-05/msg00276.html (11,497 bytes)
15. Re: [CQ-Contest] RBN Spots? (score: 1): Author: "Dan Violette" <danki6x@socal.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 15:39:14 -0700; I also agree the shorter calls are fine for skimmer. What I think is happening is when you see yourself only announced very rarely, you are not seeing skimmer spots only real people spots. Dan KI6X _; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-05/msg00277.html (8,594 bytes)
16. Re: [CQ-Contest] RBN Spots? (score: 1): Author: kd4d@comcast.net; Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 23:52:24 +0000 (UTC); Hi Al: I just use "TEST KD4D KD4D" and use escape to skip the second callsign if the rate is decent. Works fine with the skimmer. "CQ TEST" is longer and unnecessary.... Get on sometime, monitor the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-05/msg00279.html (11,874 bytes)
17. Re: [CQ-Contest] RBN Spots? (score: 1): Author: "Eric Gruff" <egruff@cox.net>; Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 18:44:45 -0700; Frank, I was basing my perceived loneliness on the N1MM+ logger info window that pops up each spot of my station. I presume it's based on the DX cluster that I selected for use during the contest, wh; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-05/msg00280.html (9,567 bytes)
18. Re: [CQ-Contest] RBN Spots? (score: 1): Author: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 22:07:39 -0400; Eric - There are two ways to generate spots in 2016. "Skimmer spots" generated by RBN, and "human entered spots" generated by real people. There are also cluster nodes and spot aggregators and spot d; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-05/msg00282.html (11,319 bytes)
19. Re: [CQ-Contest] RBN Spots? (score: 1): Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 22:29:25 -0400; In the Wednesday CWTs I use CQ CWT VE3KI as my CQ and TU VE3KI as my TU message. I send my CQ message, wait a few seconds and if no-one calls, send my CQ again on the same frequency. My experience do; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-05/msg00283.html (8,640 bytes)
20. Re: [CQ-Contest] RBN Spots? (score: 1): Author: Dave Edmonds <dave@pkministrywebs.com>; Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 23:28:33 -0400; We'll I'm glad that I asked the question...Great comments... thanks for the help!! Dave WN4AFP <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=web; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-05/msg00284.html (10,589 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]