- 1. [CQ-Contest] Re: ARRL DX CW and assisted classes (score: 1)
- Author: Tim_Coad@smtp.svl.trw.com (Tim Coad)
- Date: Tue Sep 2 17:56:44 1997
- NO NO NO......I dont think Jim meant to have that thread started up again. I think he was pointing out that single op assisted is a legitimate competitive category, not that we need to get rid of reg
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-09/msg00023.html (7,104 bytes)
- 2. [CQ-Contest] Re: ARRL DX CW and assisted classes (score: 1)
- Author: Tim_Coad@smtp.svl.trw.com (Tim Coad)
- Date: Tue Sep 2 17:56:44 1997
- NO NO NO......I dont think Jim meant to have that thread started up again. I think he was pointing out that single op assisted is a legitimate competitive category, not that we need to get rid of reg
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-09/msg00289.html (7,100 bytes)
- 3. [CQ-Contest] Re: ARRL DX CW and assisted classes (score: 1)
- Author: Tim_Coad@smtp.svl.trw.com (Tim Coad)
- Date: Tue Sep 2 17:56:44 1997
- NO NO NO......I dont think Jim meant to have that thread started up again. I think he was pointing out that single op assisted is a legitimate competitive category, not that we need to get rid of reg
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-09/msg00400.html (7,121 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu