Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Recording\s+the\s+contest\s+\-\s+unintended\s+consequences\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Recording\s+the\s+contest\s+\-\s+unintended\s+consequences\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Recording the contest - unintended consequences (score: 1): Author: "Richard DiDonna NN3W" <nn3w@cox.net>; Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 09:22:33 -0500; To be honest with you, I can see as much room for contesting abuse in self-recording as those who don't self record but snipe packet spots. Since everyone will now be required to self record, expect; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00432.html (9,425 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Recording the contest - unintended consequences (score: 1): Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 19:24:41 -0000; [tongueincheek] Ya know, now that you bring it up, I've often wondered if those guys with up a bit before submitting! [/tongueincheek] 73, de Hans, K0HB -- "5.13.2(p) Everything not specifically proh; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00442.html (7,896 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Recording the contest - unintended consequences (score: 1): Author: Mike Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>; Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 19:21:07 -0500; Tongue in cheek perhaps, butin that respect now we have to ask the question: Is recording yourself in the contest mean that you are "assisted"? (tongue kind of in cheek)..... - 73 de Mike N3LI - ____; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00470.html (7,504 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]