Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Regarding\s+Check\s+Numbers\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Regarding\s+Check\s+Numbers\.\.\.\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Regarding Check Numbers... (score: 1): Author: Steve Sacco <nn4x@embarqmail.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:53:16 -0500 (EST); If we can chose the check number, wouldn't it make sense for everyone, on least on CW to chose "55"? In any event, it would be logical for everyone to use the same number. I'm pretty sure the reason; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00408.html (7,218 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Regarding Check Numbers... (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <n5ten@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:36:36 -0800 (PST); Actually, a check of 00 would be nice, as I could then just send TT. Glad the ARRL has said that they don't care what check you send as long as it stays consistent. We should all choose the same chec; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00412.html (9,187 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Regarding Check Numbers... (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>; Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:02:19 -0600 (CST); I spent TEN MINUTES trying to get "EN61jp" across on CW in the 10 GHz contest a couple years ago. I eventually succeeded. 73, Zack W9SZ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mail; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00415.html (8,628 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Regarding Check Numbers... (score: 1): Author: "Steve Harrisonusa" <k0xp@dandy.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:29:46 -0500 (EST); Actually, it's always been so; it's just that with e-mail reflectors like this, everybody can start kibitzing and moaning and groaning about how they got snookered, or beat out, or otherwise flummox; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00420.html (8,811 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Regarding Check Numbers... (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <n5ten@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:48:08 -0800 (PST); Hi Mike, My point in this is that the rules state "the last 2 digits of the year first licensed" but people have stated publically on the reflector that they use other checks, and the ARRL has stated; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00438.html (9,566 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Regarding Check Numbers... (score: 1): Author: "K-ZERO-HB" <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:44:47 -0700; It is useful to give the IODHW (International Order of Dismayed Hand Wringers) something to do with their hands. 73, de Hans, K0HB/W7 _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailin; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00454.html (8,581 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]