Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Remote\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Remote\s*$/: 32 ]

Total 32 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote (score: 1): Author: Steef <steefpa3s@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 09:01:19 +0200; @ N5IA -> +1 Maybe, just maybe, is has the feeling that remote antennas all over the world are not far away from remote operating? There are plenty of websdr antenna systems around, and using them se; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00259.html (15,573 bytes)
22. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote (score: 1): Author: "Albert Crespo" <f5vhj@orange.fr>; Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 12:51:26 +0000; The proposed rules allow for remote. End of story. I only proposed that the actual "operator" be in the same DXCC country as the TX and RX. CQWW is supposed to be a competition. However, what about h; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00263.html (14,275 bytes)
23. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote (score: 1): Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>; Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 08:54:37 -0500; Steef, Most of the remote operations I know about are like this: An operator who, for a variety of reasons (homeowners' association, antenna restrictions, lot size, apartment dweller, lives in a deep; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00264.html (18,954 bytes)
24. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote (score: 1): Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 20:02:15 -0500; You forgot about shouldering the eternal disdain of the Irishman. That ought to count for a couple mults, at least. Dit dit, de Hans, K0HB If a guy operating remote, legally (RF within the 500-metre; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00268.html (9,691 bytes)
25. [CQ-Contest] Remote (score: 1): Author: Felipe J. Hernández <np4zet@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 17:28:20 -0400; Kelly, Great Post.. A lot of people talk about how computers and the internet are killing amateur radio, but I haven't seen a figure on how residential restrictions are keeping us out of the air. In; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00269.html (9,454 bytes)
26. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote (score: 1): Author: "PA5MW, Mark" <pa5mw@home.nl>; Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 09:23:00 +0200; Hi Felipe, Good idea! 73 Mark, PA5MW At minimum, instead of removing the extreme categories, a remote category or at least an overlay should be added. 73's and flame on! Felipe NP4Z _________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00273.html (8,495 bytes)
27. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 18:07:03 -0700; Has anyone operating remote ever won a major contest? I don't think a remote operation somewhere will will SOABHP any time soon If it does, then maybe that is time for you to worry. 73 Tom W7WHY -- s; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00276.html (10,294 bytes)
28. [CQ-Contest] Remote (score: 1): Author: <w2lc@twcny.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 17:08:54 +0000; Remote Operating As I said before: "the technology exists today to place a station capable of remote operation on each and every DXCC entity in the world." But it actually goes beyond that. We put a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00327.html (9,445 bytes)
29. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote (score: 1): Author: Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de>; Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 20:04:31 +0200; If you remote across borders, dont you need at a minimum the proper license to do that? Where is the difference to being there in person? New rule proposal: for all remote contest operations, have th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00328.html (9,158 bytes)
30. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote (score: 1): Author: w5ov@w5ov.com; Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 13:11:56 -0500; In this case, it would be a 'repeater'; invalid for contest purposes and most others. W5OV _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lis; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00329.html (10,543 bytes)
31. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote (score: 1): Author: Michael Clarson <wv2zow@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 17:28:33 -0400; Using the same logic, if I had a Bluetooth headset/microphone (frequencies restricted to keep it within the 2.4 gHz ham band), then that too would be a repeater station? I disagree -- the link betwee; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00332.html (12,087 bytes)
32. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote (score: 1): Author: w5ov@w5ov.com; Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 16:54:20 -0500; The station on Mars would *have to be a repeater* as there is no infrastructure between Mars and the other operator either. Until inter-planetary fiber is run, it would have to be a repeater. Your Bl; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00333.html (12,800 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 32
Page: [1] [2]