Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Remote\s+Site\s+Contesting\s+Rules\s*$/: 51 ]

Total 51 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Site Contesting Rules (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 19:38:07 -0700
Hi Dave et al. But what if I didn't care if I came in first or last? Or wasn't even figuring on sending in a log? All I was wanting to do is "have fun." Isn't that what contesting is all about? If no
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00303.html (9,032 bytes)

42. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Site Contesting Rules (score: 1)
Author: "Professional Home Inspections" <mackanos@rpa.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 09:04:35 -0400
Hi Dave & the rest of the group. I was just going to reply to Dave, but figured it should go to all to let you know my thoughts. Yes, there are many ideas on this topic, and I think all have a right
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00313.html (11,651 bytes)

43. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Site Contesting Rules (score: 1)
Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 10:56:42 -0800
Better start looking for some good deals on Harleys, Paul, 'cuz Remote Site Contesting is here to stay. I empathize with what you're saying, but Ham Radio and Contesting have always produced "Innovat
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00333.html (10,219 bytes)

44. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Site Contesting Rules (score: 1)
Author: "w4ZW" <w4zw@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 09:43:01 -0400
Florida is one of the leaders in CC&R's that in many cases actually restrict "Amateur Radio" by name in the Covenants, not to mention the Homeowners committees that become small zoning authorities un
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00342.html (10,900 bytes)

45. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Site Contesting Rules (score: 1)
Author: dave@ka1n.cn
Date: 20 Mar 2007 20:20:55 -0000
My view was that "equipment" included anything used to convert a signal into what is heard by operator?s ear, or converted the operator?s volitional acts (e.g. taps, finger twitches, or spoken words)
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00354.html (9,072 bytes)

46. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Site Contesting Rules (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Hilding" <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:16:06 -0800
(Also applies to When is a QSO not a QSO?) HA! I finally picked up my mail from the P.O. Box in town a while ago, and had to chuckle when I saw an article in the new April QST: "Remote Control of the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00362.html (9,457 bytes)

47. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Site Contesting Rules (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 17:48:16 -0400
Eric Hilding wrote: "Better start looking for some good deals on Harleys, Paul, 'cuz Remote Site Contesting is here to stay." Now that you mention it...gonna pick mine up, on 3/23! Maybe someday, mig
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00370.html (8,706 bytes)

48. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Site Contesting Rules (score: 1)
Author: "Paul J. Piercey" <p.piercey@nl.rogers.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 12:59:58 -0000
If the motel is in the same multiplier area; no problem. But what's to stop these guys from setting up multiple remote stations? One on the east coast and one on the west coast to increase the proxi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00382.html (12,785 bytes)

49. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Site Contesting Rules (score: 1)
Author: "w4ZW" <w4zw@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 10:17:11 -0400
This statement is patently untrue. The integration of computer communication technologies has revolutionized our equipment. If you use a computer with your rig, you are using that little RS-232 or U
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00387.html (11,073 bytes)

50. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Site Contesting Rules (score: 1)
Author: "Russell Hill" <rustyhill@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 10:05:46 -0500
Several points occur to me: 1. If I were a lone operator in a rare multiplier area I would strenuously oppose any new protocol which made it easier for another operator to set up a competing station
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00390.html (16,307 bytes)

51. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Site Contesting Rules (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Hilding" <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 18:27:04 -0800
That is absolutely wonderful, and I'm sure the remote station users appreciate all the hard work done to provide and maintain this great opportunity to operate HF. Kudos to everyone in your club invo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00417.html (9,210 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu