Author: ko7ss--- via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 04:23:36 +0000 (UTC)
"I continue to see postings of scores by a ham outside the US operating a US based remote site. The hams do not have their own US callsign and "borrow" someone else's callsign from the US. I am pre
Author: Edward Sawyer <EdwardS@advanced-conversion.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 18:43:40 +0000
KO7SS wrote: "It would be easier to opine on this situation that is bothering you if you were to post up the callsigns in question, in public, on this reflector. There may be aspects of the details y
IZ3EYZ is also licensed as KO1A 73 Peter --Original Message-- From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces+dj7ww=t-online.de@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Edward Sawyer Sent: Donnerstag, 15. Juli 2021
That one was easy. Look up the callsign on qrz.com, then do a name search. It also brings up KO1A. Next... Barry W2UP _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contes
Author: Edward Sawyer <EdwardS@advanced-conversion.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 21:03:58 +0000
Sorry, He would need to use KO1A as his call in order to be compliant. But he did not. Why would he not use KO1A as required? Ed N1UR That one was easy. Look up the callsign on qrz.com<http://qrz.com
Author: Edward Sawyer <EdwardS@advanced-conversion.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 22:51:24 +0000
I have an idea maybe because the callsign was only issued last month? Yep that would be it. Ed N1UR Sorry, He would need to use KO1A as his call in order to be compliant. But he did not. Why would he
Author: Ron Notarius W3WN via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 21:22:42 -0400
I wondered about that, but the op in question had a 2x1 prior to his current call. The 2x3 in question is assigned to an Extra in TX... not the same name, not even close. Which may be why a polite in
Perhaps he operated in a multi op environment? --Original Message-- From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces+dj7ww=t-online.de@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Edward Sawyer Sent: Donnerstag, 15. Juli
Author: Edward Sawyer <EdwardS@advanced-conversion.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 12:12:45 +0000
Interesting Ron. So I guess the question is expanded from the original to what the requirement is for someone to use their own call in a contest generically. If the "control operator" with the call i
Author: Edward Sawyer <EdwardS@advanced-conversion.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 12:20:36 +0000
In this particular example it's a single op entry. Ed N1UR --Original Message-- From: Peter Voelpel <dj7ww@t-online.de> Sent: Friday, July 16, 2021 3:33 AM To: Edward Sawyer <EdwardS@advanced-convers