Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Rig\s+Comparisons\s+for\s+Transmitter\s+Noise\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Rig\s+Comparisons\s+for\s+Transmitter\s+Noise\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Rig Comparisons for Transmitter Noise (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2014 10:13:00 -0700; Over the last decade or so, Rob Sherwood's extensive work on receiver performance has done much to improve the receivers in modern rigs, but transmitters have been sadly neglected. A month or so ago; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-09/msg00033.html (8,394 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rig Comparisons for Transmitter Noise (score: 1): Author: David Siddall <hhamwv@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2014 17:28:03 -0400; Jim, Good stuff, thanks! I also recommend K3NA's article on adjusting SSB audio chain. While specific to Orion, the principles are adaptable any any rig. http://www.k3na.org/articles/Transmit%20audio; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-09/msg00036.html (8,969 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rig Comparisons for Transmitter Noise (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2014 15:06:12 -0700; Thanks for the link, David. I have my own take on this, which is more generic and differs a bit from Eric's. Part of it is because I run SO2R feeding my mic through a YCCC box, but mostly it's the re; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-09/msg00037.html (8,937 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rig Comparisons for Transmitter Noise (score: 1): Author: "Charles Morrison" <cmorrison@lusfiber.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 07:06:35 -0500; Jim, I apologize but ask for clarity. In your paper, the CW performance data for the FT5000 is pre or post installation of this latest firmware from Yaesu which was dated on the 4th of September? Tha; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-09/msg00051.html (9,505 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rig Comparisons for Transmitter Noise (score: 1): Author: David Siddall <hhamwv@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 09:51:55 -0400; Jim, With regard to transmitted trash and technology, at the ARRL Centennial convention this summer NR0V received the ARRL Technical Innovation Award for developing his "Pure Signal" software. It run; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-09/msg00053.html (11,985 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rig Comparisons for Transmitter Noise (score: 1): Author: David Siddall <hhamwv@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 09:54:18 -0400; "Mark IV" should be "Mark V", of course. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-09/msg00054.html (12,586 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rig Comparisons for Transmitter Noise (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 09:02:15 -0700; Hi Charlie, My report is an analysis of ARRL data from their testing and published reviews. The Yaesu firmware revision is in response to my release of an early version of my report. You can check th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-09/msg00056.html (9,663 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rig Comparisons for Transmitter Noise (score: 1): Author: "XV4Y (Yan)" <xv4y@nature-mekong.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 07:25:25 +0700; Hi, As far as I understand all the data are from the ARRL Lab and have been made prior to Yaesu firmware. Also, Jim stated that Yaesu published their firmware update after he issued his paper on the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-09/msg00060.html (9,333 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]