Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SO2R\s+bashing\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SO2R\s+bashing\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] SO2R bashing (score: 1): Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>; Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2017 18:40:55 -0400; After every major contest, I see this trend bashing the SO2R ops. (even the really good ones!) I'd wager most bashers have never tried SO2R, never read up on it, watched it in real life or even seen; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-12/msg00044.html (8,793 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] SO2R bashing (score: 1): Author: "Holger Hannemann" <holger@9h3m.com>; Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2017 20:47:10 +1300; Oh boy, what did I do. I should have known, that this would happen. My deepest apology to all but especially the SO2R/SO3R/SO4R operators! I admit it was all my fault. Dear Mike, there was no bashing; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-12/msg00048.html (10,506 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R bashing (score: 1): Author: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>; Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2017 09:06:43 +0100; Is the use of skimmers/RBN nowadays allowed in all categories? All who dual cq keep two frequencies warm. 73 Peter Nobody is keeping a 2nd frequency warm. With skimmer/RBN etc. in a CW contests, it's; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-12/msg00049.html (7,468 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R bashing (score: 1): Author: Peter Sundberg <sm2cew@telia.com>; Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2017 09:31:19 +0000; Hi Mike, Unfortunately I find your description of the SO2R operators to be somewhat too polished and innocent. And there are other issues than just keeping a 2nd frequency warm, occupying double spec; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-12/msg00051.html (9,068 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]