Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SO2R\s+on\s+a\s+tiny\s+lot\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SO2R\s+on\s+a\s+tiny\s+lot\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] SO2R on a tiny lot (score: 1): Author: "Hal Kennedy" <halken@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 09:38:28 -0500; As Dave, K6LL, mentioned, it can be done. Running SO2R here, QRO both rigs, on a 70 X 100 foot lot. The "big" antenna is an 88 foot sloping dipole which is used on 80-10 and fed as a top-loaded verti; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00023.html (7,794 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R on a tiny lot (score: 1): Author: "Barry " <w2up@mindspring.com>; Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 15:50:06 -0000; While I don't have a small lot, all my antennas are on one tower (402CD @ 86 ft, TH7s @ 76, 40 & 25 ft, 80m slopers and 160 inv vee). The upper 2 TH7s are phased and the bottom one is used for radio; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00030.html (8,500 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R on a tiny lot (score: 1): Author: "VE3DZ" <va3uz@sympatico.ca>; Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 17:19:43 -0500; Barry, what happens when your radio 1 is on 80 m and radio 2 - on 160 m? I found it pretty impossible to operate like that from my place even with 100 watts and bandpass filters. Antennas are too clo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00042.html (9,310 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R on a tiny lot (score: 1): Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>; Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 00:43:27 +0000; N4GG said: As Dave, K6LL, mentioned, it can be done. Running SO2R here, QRO both rigs, on a 70 X 100 foot lot. The "big" antenna is an 88 foot sloping dipole which is used on 80-10 and fed as a top-l; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00049.html (9,337 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R on a tiny lot (score: 1): Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>; Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 19:56:10 -0600; Hi all, I realize this wasn't the original question for this thread, which was, essentially, about whether SO2R from a small lot is doable. Clearly it is. But another thread asked about SO2R by someo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00055.html (8,797 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R on a tiny lot (score: 1): Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>; Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 02:28:49 +0000; VE4XT added a very valid point: I realize this wasn't the original question for this thread, which was, essentially, about whether SO2R from a small lot is doable. Clearly it is. But another thread a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00058.html (9,369 bytes)
7. RE: [CQ-Contest] SO2R on a tiny lot (score: 1): Author: "Robert Brandon" <rb@austin.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 10:11:19 -0600; I'd start SO2R right away. I think most SO2R ops would tell you it takes a while to get good at it. I think you'll find it easier to do your first SO2R entries from a modest station in contests like; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00063.html (9,678 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]