Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SS\s+Phone\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SS\s+Phone\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] SS Phone (score: 1): Author: KI9A@aol.com; Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 23:29:05 EST; Did anyone notice how many first timers where on this year? I have a list of 12 guys that are newly licensed, & have never made a contest Q until I walked them thru it. For one, I was his 1st HF QSO.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00564.html (7,458 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Phone (score: 1): Author: Steve <steveac@charter.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 09:28:27 -0500; Good move on your part Chuck. I noticed some first-time contesters too. Perhaps 5 or 10 guys who called me and said "I'm not in the contest but wanted to give you a contact, what do you need?" It was; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00574.html (8,623 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Phone (score: 1): Author: kd4d@comcast.net; Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 14:01:04 +0000; Hi Chuck: Yes, I always enjoy doing this, telling the guys what to send for their exchange, and walking them through it. I'm even crazy enough to do it on CW! This is the primary reason I'm against r; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00576.html (8,723 bytes)
4. RE: [CQ-Contest] SS Phone (score: 1): Author: "Barry Merrill" <barry@mxg.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 12:09:55 -0600; Thanks to K5ZD's fine work on creating/updating the SS-only call sign Database; starting at mid-morning on Sunday, when I noticed a callsign that was not in the database, I welcomed them to their fir; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00587.html (8,240 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Phone (score: 1): Author: "Mike DeChristopher" <mdechristopher@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 15:52:33 -0500; I think it is a good thing to perform moderate "recruiting", especially over the air. Let's admit it - if no one bothered to, would any of us actually be here? Kudos to Chuck and everyone else. I als; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00599.html (8,969 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Phone (score: 1): Author: "Stuart Santelmann KC1F" <kc1f@adelphia.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 23:59:02 -0000; Hi Chuck: I had a number of these guys as well, and was happy to walk them through the exchange. So you created a new contester ! Very FB... Stu KC1F of walked notice ________________________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00609.html (8,002 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] SS Phone (score: 1): Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca>; Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 08:23:48 -0600; Hi all, I noticed an interesting trend last weekend. Did anyone else? I found a lot more folk were opting into Q. It seems QRP is gaining adherents, even among high-power stalwarts as K5ZD. I almost; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00632.html (7,979 bytes)
8. [CQ-Contest] SS phone (score: 1): Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca>; Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 17:40:35 -0600; Well, wasn't that a disaster? Sheesh, now we know how Jay feels. One-way prop seemed to dominate the weekend from here. It was only till late Sunday that things started to open up. There was no 15 an; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00196.html (8,616 bytes)
9. RE: [CQ-Contest] SS phone (score: 1): Author: "K0HB" <K-Zero-HB@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 05:25:32 -00; I'm glad someone else noticed! I've always kinda wondered if "one-way skip" was real, but this weekend made a believer out of me. On all bands, but it seemed especially on 20, I had many instances w; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00200.html (8,718 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS phone (score: 1): Author: Scott Nichols <snichols@mvosprey.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 10:39:47 -0400; Long East-West propagation here was the WORST I've experienced in years...NO Californian stations heard until 1400-1500 Sunday...I usually have all the CA and W7 land mults done by 0100 Sunday...West; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00207.html (10,295 bytes)
11. RE: [CQ-Contest] SS phone (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>; Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 09:02:09 -0600 (CST); I had a lot of problems making QSO's this weekend. I had to give fills on almost every QSO. I was running a barefoot TS-850. The stations I was calling were all loud and many were "A". I figured it w; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00208.html (9,194 bytes)
12. RE: [CQ-Contest] SS phone (score: 1): Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>; Date: 17 Nov 2003 09:01:20 -0600; I've sure heard enough reports of one-way propagation to believe it, but... I can also think of some other reasons for loud stations to CQ in your face.. - QRM was intense. - He had some kind of equi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00211.html (9,060 bytes)
13. RE: [CQ-Contest] SS phone (score: 1): Author: "Barry Merrill" <barry@mxg.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 10:29:36 -0600; I had two instances of one-way propagation during SS. While running on 20, I kept hearing K5RC putting out his call sign right on my frequency, but he never made a QSO, and never replied to my severa; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00217.html (8,730 bytes)
14. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS phone (score: 1): Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com; Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 12:03:42 EST; In a message dated 11/17/2003 8:40:49 AM Pacific Standard Time, barry@mxg.com writes: Then I realized I had left on the Dual Watch mode and had the second receiver active on VY1MB's 15 frequency, whi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00222.html (7,918 bytes)
15. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS phone (score: 1): Author: "Dallas and Lucy" <ludal@dmv.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 20:30:18 -0500; There are lots of other reasons as well. As is often the case on the low bands, at the sunset opening to Europe, even though Eur signals are loud, they cannot seem to hear us very well. Actually, I b; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00241.html (10,586 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]