Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Secrets\s+of\s+Contesting\,\s+Chapter\s+14\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Secrets of Contesting, Chapter 14 (score: 1)
Author: "James Neiger" <n6tj@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 23:19:01 -0800
Secrets of Contesting, Chapter 14 As we approach what is sometimes under-rated, but never should it be diminished, the greatest of all DX Contests, the ARRL DX, perhaps it is timely enough to state s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00507.html (11,840 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Secrets of Contesting, Chapter 14 (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 09:20:14 -0500
At 11:19 PM 1/30/04 -0800, James Neiger wrote: These are the days of PACKET. Love it or leave it. We are all beneficiaries of its prowess and victims of its success. But recognizing that it is, and m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00513.html (9,446 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Secrets of Contesting, Chapter 14 (score: 1)
Author: "Barry " <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 14:35:29 -0000
<more snipped> Jim sez above: "However, I believe that unless YOUR rate is 200+ per hour, it is your responsibility to harken to the DX station's operating procedure." It seems to me Jim is saying if
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00514.html (10,273 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Secrets of Contesting, Chapter 14 (score: 1)
Author: "Dennis McAlpine" <dennis.mcalpine@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 09:52:45 -0500
Wonderful words of wisdom as always, Mr. Neiger. But, I must admit, it is one of the few times I have ever see a quote from Spiderman. Onward and upward. 73, Dennis, K2SX make unqualifed some might s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00515.html (14,103 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Secrets of Contesting, Chapter 14 (score: 1)
Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kharker@cs.utexas.edu>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 11:08:00 -0600
... I totally disagree with this. Many DX stations arrogantly feel that they can make _many_ QSOs in a row without giving out their callsign. A lot of them, I am sure, are relying upon the packet net
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00519.html (10,981 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Secrets of Contesting, Chapter 14 (score: 1)
Author: "Lee Hiers" <aa4ga@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 17:46:24 -0500
Making the DX happy is the most important thing, for sure... Makes sense. Well, if a DX station doesn't ID enough, it's more of a waste of time for the caller to sit and wait for him to give his call
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00522.html (12,065 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Secrets of Contesting, Chapter 14 (score: 1)
Author: "Alan C. Zack" <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 20:31:00 -0800
Hi Jim, Thanks for the helpful info. As you say it is very disheartening when someone is able to persuade the DX station to QSY or change modes in the middle of a big run. Every 2 years or so I go to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00523.html (15,645 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Secrets of Contesting, Chapter 14 (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca>
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 10:44:53 -0600
Jim's admonition about not calling unless you know the ID of the station you're calling only reiterates one of the fundamental principles of on-air behaviour, contesting or otherwise. That it has gen
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00006.html (14,282 bytes)

9. RE: [CQ-Contest] Secrets of Contesting, Chapter 14 (score: 1)
Author: "James Neiger" <n6tj@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 19:57:18 -0800
Poignant words, indeed, from our friend to the north, Kelly. Gosh, when I composed Ch. 14, after too much prodding from my friend in the East, NEVER did I realize I'd be stirring-up such a hornet's n
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00024.html (16,609 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Secrets of Contesting, Chapter 14 (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Root" <steve.root@culligan4water.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 12:27:51 -0000
This is further complicated when you factor in propagation. If you're on the low bands, that one time you send your call every five minutes is probably going to to be buried in noise or QRM. For a lo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00027.html (8,865 bytes)

11. RE: [CQ-Contest] Secrets of Contesting, Chapter 14 (score: 1)
Author: "Hanlon, Steve" <SHanlon@dnr.state.md.us>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 07:34:04 -0500
devil's advocate mode on: what if i believe i have the callsign correct, yet it turns out not to be? then what happens? my callsign, KB3KAQ, caused a little confusion during the recent VHF Sweepstak
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00029.html (8,905 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Secrets of Contesting, Chapter 14 (score: 1)
Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kharker@cs.utexas.edu>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 10:15:05 -0600
Maybe I wasn't clear in my assertion that calling and asking for a callsign is the right thing for a contester to do when faced with a non-IDing station. What I have in mind is something like the fol
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00036.html (14,253 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Secrets of Contesting, Chapter 14 (score: 1)
Author: "Lee Hiers" <aa4ga@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 11:46:07 -0500
And once you've done that and the station doesn't ID, what do you do then? Get the call before the exchange or you may never get the QSO...sure the other guy may lose credit, but so what? You've more
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00037.html (8,604 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu