Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Signal\s+Report\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Signal\s+Report\s*$/: 32 ]

Total 32 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Signal report (score: 1): Author: Al Lorona <alorona@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 17:12:09 -0800 (PST); What is the purpose of the signal report in the exchange for the ARRL 160m contest? That is the question posed by my 10-year-old son after he wandered into the shack as I began operating last weeke; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00322.html (8,993 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Signal report (score: 1): Author: KI9A@aol.com; Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 22:01:53 EST; Wow, is he a ham also? Copying contest speed code for 10 year old is outstanding!! 73- Chuck KI9A In a message dated 12/10/2008 8:59:56 P.M. Central Standard Time, alorona@sbcglobal.net writes: few c; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00326.html (7,496 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Signal report (score: 1): Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 03:45:56 -0800; It's not a signal report. It's a "catch your breath place marker" to signal the next thing you hear will be their ARRL section. In CQWW it's there to alert you to visually confirm that they send the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00327.html (8,061 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Signal report (score: 1): Author: somata90924@mypacks.net; Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 22:24:02 -0600 (GMT-06:00); so.......send a real sig report? THATS THE ANSWER --SEND A REAL REPORT. --Original Message-- Joe Hypnarowski _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contest; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00328.html (10,475 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Signal report (score: 1): Author: KI9A@aol.com; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 06:49:34 EST; So, when I have my rf gain cranked up, and filters in, with a ton of qrm around, how exactly do you propose I determine what a true signal report is?? What if my rig has a non-functioning S meter? Ca; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00329.html (7,887 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] Signal Report (score: 1): Author: kr2q@optimum.net; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:52:47 +0000 (GMT); Of course, your son is correct. It serves no purpose (any longer) other to tell the other guy, "get ready, here comes the part you actually have to copy." In theory, the same is true for CQWW, except; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00330.html (8,104 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Signal report (score: 1): Author: "Paul O'Kane" <pokane@ei5di.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 06:10:57 -0800; There is no such thing as a "real" report. The ARRL realised that many years ago, and it's why no reports are needed on QSLs for ARRL DX awards. Is it time for the Contest Branch to follow suit? DXer; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00332.html (8,266 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Signal Report (score: 1): Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 09:33:20 EST; In theory, the same is true for CQWW, except you don't have to send anything since: A. everybody is 599 B. you already know what zone everybody is in (99.9% of the time) C. if B isn't correct, then A; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00337.html (9,403 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Signal report (score: 1): Author: "Milt, N5IA" <n5ia@zia-connection.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 07:47:31 -0700; About 60% of the signals at my station are S-0 or less with the Beverages. So, I am supposed to make up a signal report that will be just as much a "lie" as the canned 5NN. I guess the only thing to; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00339.html (8,865 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Signal report (score: 1): Author: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@telia.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 15:42:22 +0100; Seems like many are concerned about not wasting time. Not to waist time people send cut numbers, doesn´t give callsign for every QSO etc. People doesn´t like to send signal report or zone, and so on; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00340.html (9,681 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Signal report (score: 1): Author: "Zack Widup" <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 09:32:09 -0600; That's one thing I like about SS, VHF contests, NAQP etc. which do not have a "signal report" as part of their exchange. The exchange is usually something you actually have to copy. I may know what g; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00341.html (11,449 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Signal report (score: 1): Author: "David Kopacz" <david.kopacz@aspwebhosting.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:10:21 -0600; Seriously, if we aren´t going to send signal report and zone in CQWW, what are we going to send? / Jim SM2EKM How about last year's UBN report? David ~ KY1V? _________________________________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00343.html (8,987 bytes)
13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Signal report (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@pclink.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 13:13:16 -0600; Heh heh heh... Jim I think you found the root of the problem! Wasting time. But in case a contester insists he must turn his radio on, then we need to take Paul's calculation a step further. There's; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00344.html (12,642 bytes)
14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Signal Report (score: 1): Author: "Paul J. Piercey" <p.piercey@nl.rogers.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:25:12 -0800; Like I said before... What's wrong with a random number? Your logging program issues one that you pass on to the other station and his does the same for him to send to you. No more mindless 59 5 or e; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00345.html (10,470 bytes)
15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Signal report (score: 1): Author: Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 08:23:22 -0800 (PST); Serial number and power... Julius Fazekas N2WN Tennessee Contest Group TnQP http://www.tnqp.org/ Elecraft K2/100 #4455 Elecraft K3/100 #366 _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00346.html (11,934 bytes)
16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Signal report (score: 1): Author: "Paul O'Kane" <pokane@ei5di.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:26:02 -0800; <snip> A serial. That keeps everyone honest, and forces you to actually copy it. CQWW scoring would stay the same because the software knows the country and zone from the callsign, and a serial would; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00347.html (9,353 bytes)
17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Signal Report (score: 1): Author: "Ted Bryant" <W4NZ@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:22:14 -0500; In one session of the weekly Thursday night NS, the Northern California Contest Club-sponsored weekly Sprint, in the sent exchange instead of sending your name you sent your ORIGINAL callsign. This w; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00348.html (9,440 bytes)
18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Signal report (score: 1): Author: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:13:28 -0800; Hey, we have a contest like that! WPX is signal report and serial number. There are other contests that require copying serial numbers as well. CQ WW is like the Mount Everest of contesting. It is th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00349.html (11,201 bytes)
19. Re: [CQ-Contest] Signal report (score: 1): Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:28:14 +0000; We REALLY need some sunspots! David Robbins K1TTT e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net web: http://www.k1ttt.net AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net ________________________________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00350.html (9,341 bytes)
20. [CQ-Contest] Signal report (score: 1): Author: Bob Schreibmaier <k3ph@ptd.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 15:01:38 -0500; contest? Same as every contest: Frame Alignment Word (FAW). What follows is useful information, listen closely. 73, Bob K3PH -- +--+ +--+ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest m; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00351.html (6,973 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]