Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Single\s+Op\s+Unassisted\s+\-\s+Propagation\s+Assistance\?\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Single Op Unassisted - Propagation Assistance? (score: 1)
Author: Tim Duffy K3LR <k3lr@k3lr.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 12:17:22 -0600
Although I haven't operated single op in a long time, several radio friends of mine still do. I really admire them! Lots of questions come and go over a good cup of coffee. I am curious what this gro
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00360.html (11,998 bytes)

2. RE: [CQ-Contest] Single Op Unassisted - Propagation Assistance? (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 22:53:39 -00
Internet As you know, Tim, I'm very much a "boy and his radio" kind of contester. In that mindset, any information which doesn't reach me via my antenna-connector/headset route doesn't belong in the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00369.html (9,440 bytes)

3. RE: [CQ-Contest] Single Op Unassisted - Propagation Assistance? (score: 1)
Author: Eric Scace K3NA <eric@k3na.org>
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 18:35:21 -0500
I occasionally get the chance to operate SOAB-HP unassisted. I use DXAtlas and Ionoprobe, both of which download real-time data from the Internet. In reading the WW rules, nothing seems to remotely i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00371.html (10,933 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] Single Op Unassisted - Propagation Assistance? (score: 1)
Author: "Ken Widelitz" <widelitz@gte.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 20:21:28 -0800
Getting propagation assistance over the internet is no different than having the XYL bring you food. 2.1.Single Operator: One person performs all transmitting, receiving, spotting, and logging functi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00372.html (9,062 bytes)

5. RE: [CQ-Contest] Single Op Unassisted - Propagation Assistance? (score: 1)
Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 12:07:36 -0000
WHAT?!?!? Xyl's can bring you food?! There ought to be a rule against this to level the playing field! What about those of us who are xyl-less, who's going to bring us food??? David Robbins K1TTT e-
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00376.html (9,493 bytes)

6. RE: [CQ-Contest] Single Op Unassisted - Propagation Assistance? (score: 1)
Author: <jukka.klemola@nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 14:28:57 +0200
... So if your pedal breaks and someone sets you another foot switch, you are in multiop? There is a bunch of WW winning scores done against rules. 73, Jukka OH6LI __________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00378.html (10,320 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Single Op Unassisted - Propagation Assistance? (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 15:58:41 -0000
What if you get your propagation reports from your local packetcluster and promise you won't look at the spots just the wwv. MAL N7MAL BULLHEAD CITY, AZ http://www.ctaz.com/~suzyq/N7mal.htm -- Origin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00384.html (11,330 bytes)

8. RE: [CQ-Contest] Single Op Unassisted - Propagation Assistance? (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 13:52:34 -0500
Now wait a minute, Dave. Those of you without an XYL have an unfair advantage in scheduling and lack of resistance to massive towers on the property. Besides, my XYL has never bought me so much as a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00396.html (10,697 bytes)

9. RE: [CQ-Contest] Single Op Unassisted - Propagation Assistance? (score: 1)
Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 18:54:15 -0000
On most nodes you just type the command set/nodx and you won't get any dx spots. David Robbins K1TTT e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net web: http://www.k1ttt.net AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00397.html (12,339 bytes)

10. RE: [CQ-Contest] Single Op Unassisted - Propagation Assistance? (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 14:19:42 -0500
This isn't the first time this particular "controversy" has come up. I know some top-ranked purists who think internet propagation reports shouldn't be consulted. Personally, I see no harm in it and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00398.html (14,248 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Single Op Unassisted - Propagation Assistance? (score: 1)
Author: "Stephen M. Murphy" <murphys@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 15:19:51 -0500
The pizza guy... _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00402.html (10,639 bytes)

12. RE: [CQ-Contest] Single Op Unassisted - Propagation Assistance? (score: 1)
Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 20:42:42 -0000
now I'm really jealous! No pizza place is close enough for delivery here! David Robbins K1TTT e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net web: http://www.k1ttt.net AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00404.html (9,708 bytes)

13. RE: [CQ-Contest] Single Op Unassisted - Propagation Assistance? (score: 1)
Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 15:14:36 -0800
The U.S. Tower Girls would be nice :-) 73... Rick, K6VVA _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00406.html (9,762 bytes)

14. RE: [CQ-Contest] Single Op Unassisted - Propagation Assistance? (score: 1)
Author: "Georgens, Tom" <tom.georgens@engenio.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 15:42:53 -0800
Funny you should use that example. On Saturday night of the last CQWW, my footswitch failed. I use the footswitch for SO2R and not PTT so I could still operate. When I took a break, I knew I had anot
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00408.html (11,354 bytes)

15. RE: [CQ-Contest] Single Op Unassisted - Propagation Assistance? (score: 1)
Author: "George Skoubis" <george.skoubis@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 22:45:57 -0600
Level the Playing Field? Surely you jest? Those of you without XYL's should remember some of us have to do the following on a contest weekend... A. Explain why you need to operate in this contest. 10
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00415.html (12,590 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Single Op Unassisted - Propagation Assistance? (score: 1)
Author: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@telia.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 06:47:38 +0100
Well, consider yourself lucky. You should not eat pizza since it is very unhelty food. 73 Jim SM2EKM -- David Robbins K1TTT wrote: The pizza guy... now I'm really jealous! No pizza place is close eno
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00416.html (10,355 bytes)

17. RE: [CQ-Contest] Single Op Unassisted - Propagation Assistance? (score: 1)
Author: <jukka.klemola@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:13:51 +0200
Tom, You were clearly a multiop as you got switching assistance from your daughter.. HA ! Keep on Having Fun ! 73, Jukka OH6LI Funny you should use that example. On Saturday night of the last CQWW, m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00421.html (9,985 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Single Op Unassisted - Propagation Assistance? (score: 1)
Author: "Yuri VE3DZ" <va3uz@sympatico.ca>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:15:49 -0500
I Know one guy who does same thing on a weekend. But he just doesn't bother to contest anymore. Yuri VE3DZ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contestin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00425.html (11,570 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] Single Op Unassisted - Propagation Assistance? (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 11:50:45 EST
This proves those of us with XYL's should multiply our score by 1.3125 to compensate when there is a 48 hour contest. And you not counting in-laws :-) Had one situation, back in VE3BMV days, when in-
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00430.html (10,352 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] Single Op Unassisted - Propagation Assistance? (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy <i4jmy.mauri@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 10:28:23 +0100
I respectulyy disagree with the point that packet is only a crutch for handicapped, it can be instead a weapon. I know about "winning" operators dealing hard to have internet it in the most lost lan
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00451.html (10,096 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu