- 1. [CQ-Contest] Skimmer bashing (score: 1)
- Author: ko7ss@yahoo.com
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 08:49:43 -0800 (PST)
- Some of the CQWWCW 3830 posts and a few individuals on this forum certainly are forthcoming with their opinions about Skimmers and the contesters that admit to using them (by entering the assisted cl
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-11/msg00315.html (8,046 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer bashing (score: 1)
- Author: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 12:41:13 +1100
- Again, if it (Skimmer) attracts more contestants, and generates Absolutely! And the following are good for ALL of us - for the same reasons. High power. Extra-Class licences on demand. Integration w
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-11/msg00330.html (7,575 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer bashing (score: 1)
- Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 19:21:17 -0700
- Another silly and exaggerated extrapolation, Paul. Besides, about half of those things you quote ARE good for ham radio! ;) Dave AB7E Again, if it (Skimmer) attracts more contestants, and generates A
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-11/msg00331.html (8,106 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu