To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer bashing |
From: | Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com> |
Date: | Fri, 30 Nov 2012 12:41:13 +1100 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
On 30/11/2012 03:49, ko7ss@yahoo.com wrote: Again, if it (Skimmer) attracts more contestants, and generates > more QSO's, it must be good for ALL of us. Absolutely! And the following are good for ALL of us - for the same reasons. High power. Extra-Class licences on demand. Integration with Facebook and Skype. More data modes. No-exam ham licences for CBers. Remote receivers and transmitters. 73, Paul EI5DI _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] How isthe Skimmer different?, Charles Harpole |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer bashing, David Gilbert |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Skimmer bashing, ko7ss |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer bashing, David Gilbert |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |